Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Pannick (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Marriages and Civil Partnerships (Approved Premises) (Amendment) Regulations 2011.


Marriages and Civil Partnerships (Approved Premises) (Amendment) Regulations 2011

I submit that this Parliament must proceed by what we recognise is the overwhelming probability. We cannot legislate on the basis of something that would be wholly contrary to what Parliament has decided as recently as 2010. I say with great respect to the noble Lord that the attitude of the European Court is completely irrelevant to this debate. I have to tell noble Lords that if I were asked to advise a client on the prospects of success for someone who wished to compel a religious body to hold a civil partnership ceremony against its will, my advice—and, I am sure, the advice of every other competent lawyer practising in this field—would be that any such application would be completely hopeless and misguided. Therefore, I hope that the noble Baroness will withdraw her Prayer for annulment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
733 c1426 
Session
2010-12
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Civil partnerships Ceremonies Equality Discrimination Marriage Registration Religious freedom Religious buildings
Legislation
Marriages and Civil Partnerships (Approved Premises) (Amendment) Regulations 2011
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk