Proceeding contribution from Lord Henley (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Thursday, 15 December 2011. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Marriages and Civil Partnerships (Approved Premises) (Amendment) Regulations 2011.
Marriages and Civil Partnerships (Approved Premises) (Amendment) Regulations 2011
My Lords, I am making, as my noble and learned friend put it, a considered ministerial Statement from the Dispatch Box, in line with the case he referred to, Pepper v Hart. Yes, I believe that this Act covers both the 2004 Act and the Equality Act 2010. As I said earlier, it would be very odd if the Equality Act was considered to have spoken inconsistently. However, I can give my noble and learned friend the assurance that he seeks.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 733 c1446
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Civil partnerships Ceremonies Equality Discrimination Marriage Registration Religious freedom Religious buildings
- Legislation
- Marriages and Civil Partnerships (Approved Premises) (Amendment) Regulations 2011
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 14:20:07 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795751
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795751
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_795751