Proceeding contribution from George Mudie (Labour) in the House of Commons on Monday, 6 February 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Financial Services Bill.
Financial Services Bill
One suggestion from the Treasury Select Committee was that the Chancellor should not send the proposals to a statutory instrument Committee. That would involve a 90-minute discussion and the proposals would not be amendable. He should instead allow the matters to be debated seriously on the Floor of the House. I wonder why he would think it attractive and helpful to send them upstairs where they cannot be amended; that would suggest a foregone conclusion by the governing party that they would be accepted.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 540 c53-4
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Consumers Banks Credit Building societies Bank of England Financial services Financial Services Authority Protection Regulation Financial Policy Committee Financial Conduct Authority Prudential Regulation Authority
- Legislation
- Financial Services Bill 2010-12 to 2012-13
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:24:54 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807274
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807274
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807274