Proceeding contribution from Lord Borrie (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 February 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
Protection of Freedoms Bill
One has to examine the word need. Trading standards officers are given powers by various statutes for the public benefit—usually consumer protection—and the benefit of other legitimate traders who are not engaging in what appears to be illegal conduct. The trading standards officer wants to examine that. He needs to do it to fulfil his duty. The noble and learned Lord, Lord Scott of Foscote, has suggested that because magistrates are available literally night and day in order to get warrants when needed, there is no problem. However, the trading standards officer still has to prove something. No magistrate worth his salt is going to accept what a public official says without question in all circumstances. Therefore the amendment that the noble Lord, Lord Marlesford, seeks to introduce is good for trading standards. It might also be good for other equally legitimate work done by other public officials.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 735 c15
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Criminal records Devolved matters Appeals Detainees Employment Immobilisation of vehicles Legislation Harassment Motor vehicles Parking Powers of entry Personal records Protection Metals Vetting Terrorism Security Right of search Theft Stalking
- Legislation
- Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:20:09 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807516
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807516
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807516