Proceeding contribution from Lord Stewartby (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 February 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
Protection of Freedoms Bill
My Lords, I want to add only a small footnote. I begin by expressing our gratitude to the noble Lord, Lord Marlesford, for the diligence that he has shown, not only on this occasion and in this context but because he is constantly on the lookout for failures or delays by government departments or other public bodies. He has made rather a specialisation of taking the opportunity to raise these in this forum. Currently, as always, it is an interesting and not entirely straightforward problem that comes before us. My noble friend Lord Henley circulated a note last week on a possible exception to the requirement to demonstrate that entry would be frustrated if a warrant or agreement were sought. He argued that the Home Office considered that such an exception would be unworkable. I would be very grateful for more explanation of what ““unworkable”” means in this context.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 735 c23
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Criminal records Devolved matters Appeals Detainees Employment Immobilisation of vehicles Legislation Harassment Motor vehicles Parking Powers of entry Personal records Protection Metals Vetting Terrorism Security Right of search Theft Stalking
- Legislation
- Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:20:14 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807523
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807523
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807523