Proceeding contribution from Baroness Hayter of Kentish Town (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 February 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
Protection of Freedoms Bill
42: Clause 54, page 40, line 24, at end insert— ““if there is no charge for unauthorised parking or if the following conditions are met— (a) one or more notices which were clearly displayed when the vehicle was parked and— (i) specify the sum of the charge for unauthorised parking; and (ii) are adequate to bring the charge and parking requirements to the notice of drivers who park vehicles on the relevant land; (b) the consent of the driver of the vehicle to the restriction was indicated by the positive acceptance of appropriate documentation before parking on the relevant land; and (c) the owner or occupier of the land or those authorised to act on their behalf are unable to take steps to enforce the payment of parking charges against the driver because they do not know, and the driver has refused to provide, both their name and a current address for service for the driver.””
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 735 c58
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Criminal records Devolved matters Appeals Detainees Employment Immobilisation of vehicles Legislation Harassment Motor vehicles Parking Powers of entry Personal records Protection Metals Vetting Terrorism Security Right of search Theft Stalking
- Legislation
- Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:19:09 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807556
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807556
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807556