Proceeding contribution from Lord Lucas (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 6 February 2012. It occurred during Debate on bill on Protection of Freedoms Bill.
Protection of Freedoms Bill
My Lords, I very much look forward to reading the report tomorrow. I support the direction that the noble Baronesses have taken but I feel that Amendment 49A raises too many questions, particularly around the boundary of what is and is not acceptable conduct. For example, there is no requirement on A to behave reasonably, only on B. In subsection (5) of the proposed new clause we are getting close to the continental form of law where something is permitted only if it is allowed in legislation, whereas in the English form of law something is permitted if it is not forbidden in legislation. That requires careful consideration. I hope that the report of the noble Baroness will be the start of that process, and that my noble friend will be very supportive in his reply.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 735 c83
- Session
- 2010-12
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Criminal records Devolved matters Appeals Detainees Employment Immobilisation of vehicles Legislation Harassment Motor vehicles Parking Powers of entry Personal records Protection Metals Vetting Terrorism Security Right of search Theft Stalking
- Legislation
- Protection of Freedoms Bill 2010-12
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-15 15:19:18 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807580
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807580
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_807580