Skip to main content

1-20 of 591 results for subject:Cryptography

Year X
2005

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

No, you said that they are terrorists!

Member
Lord Gould of Brookwood (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1172
House
House of Lords

This is a very interesting debate, and I am glad to follow the views expressed by the noble Lord, Lord Condon, who was commissioner of the Metropolitan Police when I was Attorney-General. This is a difficult question. We have all agonised over the right balance between the existing 14 days,...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1177-8
House
House of Lords

It is with great reluctance that I find myself unable to wholeheartedly support the amendment put forward today and, on a day of unusual disagreements in your Lordships’ House, I add to the unusual circumstances by finding myself for the first time in my life not wholeheartedly supporting something put...

Member
Lord Condon (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1174-5
House
House of Lords

I am listening very carefully to the noble Lord. What would persuade him that up to 90 days was justifiable?

Member
Lord Stratford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1175
House
House of Lords

Up to 90 days can be justified in individual cases; that is not the point that I am making. My point is that, on balance, it may be    counterproductive. This is not about detecting, incriminating and putting behind bars a finite number of people; this is a philosophical struggle that will endure...

Member
Lord Condon (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1175-6
House
House of Lords

Of course the noble Lord is right that this is a philosophical struggle; unfortunately, it has very real practical outcomes where we fail to protect people. It is on those outcomes that some Members of the Committee might focus a little more. Like many, I found the comparison with South...

Member
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1176
House
House of Lords

Oh, I knew that I would not get through it.

Member
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1176
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness paints a very dark picture. Does she agree that those problems could not be solved within 90 days at all, and that therefore the need for the continuing investigation—it goes on whether a person is charged or not—is essential?

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1177
House
House of Lords

Ninety days gives us a much better shot than 28. I have not even touched on the points about the fiercely independent different security systems that run around all the countries in question. We in the United Kingdom are peculiarly well placed; perhaps we do not recognise it as much...

Member
Baroness Symons of Vernham Dean (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1177
House
House of Lords

I wonder whether I could make a brief contribution from these Benches, although I speak entirely in my own capacity; words such as ““Daniel in the lion’s den”” come immediately to mind. I pay tribute to those who have brought the amendment before the Chamber and in doing so have...

Member
Bishop of Chester (Bishops (affiliation))
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1173
House
House of Lords

I have no expertise to offer in this debate. I listened to the noble Baronesses, Lady Ramsay of Cartvale and Lady Park, and to the noble Lord, Lord Imbert, with close attention, but I am not fit to make the judgment which they make on the basis of so much...

Member
Lord Lipsey (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1171-2
House
House of Lords

I really do not think that the late Lord Callaghan, who was, indeed, a great Prime Minister, would have been foolish enough to bring such a proposition to the House of Commons. The House of Commons would not have needed to deal with that. I fear that the import of...

Member
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1172
House
House of Lords

As someone who comes from Northern Ireland I feel I ought to say something about this matter in relation to terrorism. The noble Lord, Lord Imbert, referred to a hypothetical situation. However, the situation in Northern Ireland is not hypothetical. Where the Government are going wrong is in not doing...

Member
Viscount Brookeborough (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1170
House
House of Lords

The noble and learned Lord, Lord Fraser, said that he had heard no justification at all for a period of detention of up to 90 days. All I can say is that he could not have listened to the noble Lord, Lord Imbert. The noble and learned Lord may have...

Member
Lord Stratford (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1170-1
House
House of Lords

I was tempted simply to say in response that the noble and learned Lord knows how incredibly difficult it is to get all three sides to agree on anything in this Bill. Having achieved that rare feat, far be it from me to seek to unpick it. However, I am...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1159-60
House
House of Lords

The noble Baroness called herself a realist; I do myself, too. I can see there is no support for the amendment—I am a lone voice, crying in the wilderness. I am not convinced but, nevertheless, I seek leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1160
House
House of Lords

This is the first occasion I can recall on which we are going to disagree with the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd, for the second time in the course of an afternoon. The noble and learned Lord described the procedure between arrest and charge as a ““purely administrative”” one....

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1158-9
House
House of Lords

Very briefly and with the same reservations, I support the need for a High Court judge. I do not think that this is an administrative procedure. It is rightly given to someone who stands far from the administration and who is a judicial authority. For short periods it can be...

Member
Lord Lyell of Markyate (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1159
House
House of Lords

The amendment to Clause 23, relating to the period a suspected terrorist may be held before charge, is one of the most important clauses in the Bill. If the 28 days agreed to in another place is accepted, and the maximum of 90 days, with weekly robust judicial oversight, as...

Member
Lord Imbert (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1163-4
House
House of Lords

As will be appreciated—

Member
Lord Davies of Coity (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
13 December 2005
Reference
676 c1164
House
House of Lords