Skip to main content

1-20 of 347 results for subject:Incitement

Year X
2009

Type

House

Session

Month

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Coroners and Justice Bill. Lords consideration of Commons reason and amendment. Lords amendments 1, 2, 216 not insisted on, and amendment 1B proposed in lieu. Lords amendment 55 not insisted on, and an amendment in lieu disagreed to. Lords amendments 59, 119, 121, 236, 239 insisted on. Lords amendment 66...

Department
Ministry of Justice
Type
Debates on bills
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c823-72
House
House of Lords

I am afraid that it does. The point that I was about to make is that legislation, in the signals that it sends to the world outside, can have an impact on behaviour way beyond the actual meaning of the words in the legislation. There is already a huge amount...

Member
Lord Smith of Finsbury (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c856
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I rise to plead with your Lordships’ House to reject the amendment and agree with the House of Commons. I do so because it is important for us to recognise the signal that legislation sometimes sends to the world outside. The problem is that we are faced with...

Member
Lord Smith of Finsbury (Non-affiliated)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c855
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I oppose the amendment. As the Minister said, this is the fourth time that we have discussed this issue. In July, the noble Lord, Lord Waddington, was successful in gaining the support of a majority of your Lordships. It is before us again tonight because the Government, I...

Member
Baroness Turner of Camden (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c851-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 66 seeks to establish an independent commissioner for terrorist suspects. As my noble friend Lord Brett indicated in Committee, we are concerned that the establishment of such a commissioner would have a detrimental effect on the efficient and effective conduct of terrorist investigations. Such investigations are fast-moving...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c867-9
House
House of Lords

That this House do not insist on its Amendment 66 to which the Commons have disagreed and do agree with the Commons in their Amendment 66A in lieu thereof. That this House do not insist on its Amendment 66 to which the Commons have disagreed and do agree with the...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c866-7
House
House of Lords

I am bound to say that I have been rather surprised by the Minister’s reply. At no time has he sought to address the issue before the House tonight. There is no doubt that there have been abuses in the sense of inappropriate action by the police. My amendment is...

Member
Lord Waddington (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c863-4
House
House of Lords

I hope that I have answered my noble friend; he knows ACPO’s position. I repeat that these offences relate only to threatening words and behaviour intended to stir up hatred. They were introduced because of the fact that gay men were often subject to attacks of this kind. That is...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c863
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may first address the concerns of the noble Lord, Lord Pannick, who explained rather better than I can from my notes the basis of his first point. Proposed new subsection (3A) is meant to relate to the narrow point of operational police matters. Because the ICVs...

Member
Lord Tunnicliffe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c871-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I share the regrets and concerns expressed by the noble Baroness, Lady Neville-Jones. Of course, the purpose of the new clause agreed to by this House is to ensure that, where the police apply for an extension of the period of detention for a terrorist suspect, the judge...

Member
Lord Pannick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c870-1
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I find it disappointing that the Government’s objection to the notion of having a special commissioner for terrorist suspects is based on the idea that it would somehow obstruct speedy or fair process. This idea is part of UK experience; it has been in operation in Northern Ireland....

Member
Baroness Neville-Jones (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c869-70
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I come from a city where there is freedom. You can write to the local newspaper, criticise gay pride, raise issues on the radio and in phone-ins, and no action is taken by the police. Will the Minister clarify the position as regards ACPO, given that we are...

Member
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c862
House
House of Lords

I am grateful. I was just about to move on to ACPO and what the noble Lord, Lord Dear, told us. He said in July: "““However, my recent discussions privately with senior ACPO figures, including those most closely involved with issues of this nature, reveal two facts critical to our...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c862
House
House of Lords

In another place and, I suspect, in another age, I would be sending my seconds round to the Minister at this point—but I resist that temptation. Perhaps I may read from my speaking notes accurately for a second time. I said: "““The Association of Chief Police Officers (ACPO) has carefully...

Member
Lord Dear (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c863
House
House of Lords

The Minister is on an important point. Perhaps he can give us a guarantee that the Government will not seek to remove the similar provision concerning religious discrimination.

Member
Lord Tebbit (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c861
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord said that the police have been criticised. That is not the real point. This lady wrote a private letter to her local authority and it should have been kept confidential. The police would not have been involved unless that local authority—perhaps by breaking the Data Protection Act—had...

Member
Lord Stoddart of Swindon (Independent Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c861-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I cannot give guarantees about any future Government. That provision was passed by a majority of one vote in the House of Commons and became the law. Of course I understand that completely. However, the noble Lord may hope that his party will come to power in a...

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c861
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may intervene. I did not speak earlier, because we wanted to get through the debate quickly. I live in Brighton where you have complete freedom.

Member
Lord Brooke of Alverthorpe (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c862
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord makes a fair point.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c862
House
House of Lords

I think that I already have done that. The noble Lord made a fair point. The point that I am trying to make is that this lady would not fall foul of this legislation, whether or not there was a freedom-of-expression clause.

Member
Lord Bach (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
11 November 2009
Reference
714 c862
House
House of Lords