Skip to main content

1-20 of 134 results for subject:Storage

Session X
2006-07

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

(2) what the capacity is of private storage for lamb carcases available for use by his Department in each parliamentary constituency.

Asked by
Roger Williams (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2007
Reference
160637; 465 c1114-5W
House
House of Commons

To ask the Secretary of State for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (1) what proportion of the private cold storage facility available to his Department was in use for lamb and beef carcasses in the week beginning (a) 3 September 2007, (b) 10 September 2007, (c) 17 September 2007, (d)...

Asked by
Roger Williams (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
30 October 2007
Reference
160636; 465 c1114-5W
House
House of Commons

My Lords, I begin by declaring an interest albeit a rather diffuse one: before I was personally transmuted into a theoretical biologist with interests in ecology and conservation biology, I was a plasma physicist working on the basic science underlying fusion reaction. I spent 11 years at Princeton as the...

Member
Lord May of Oxford (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1226-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak as a member of the Science and Technology Select Committee, although I was not involved in the initial report on the management of radioactive nuclear waste back in 1999, and only peripherally involved in the 2004 report which was under way when I joined the committee...

Member
Baroness Sharp of Guildford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1223-6
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak in support of the report of the Science and Technology Committee. Nuclear waste is an essential part of restarting the UK nuclear energy programme. I declare an interest as a member of the stakeholder advisory group of EDF Energy, but my remarks are entirely my own....

Member
Lord Hunt of Chesterton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1221-2
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That this House takes note of the report of the Science and Technology Committee on Radioactive Waste Management: An Update (4th Report, HL Paper 109). The noble Earl said: My Lords, I move the Motion in the place of the noble Lord, Lord Broers, the chairman of...

Member
Earl of Selborne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1219-21
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as has been said, the first inquiry by the Select Committee on Science and Technology was published in March 1999—eight and a half years ago. In the subsequent years, Government have shown a mixture of procrastination, indecision and, most importantly, a failure to grasp the nature of the...

Member
Lord Tombs (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1231-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, many of the points that I might have made have already been well made by others. I was a member of the original Select Committee in 1999, chaired by the noble Lord, Lord Tombs, and I have had the privilege of serving as either a member or a...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1228-31
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in the last debate, one of your distinguished Members commented that you are not unanimous on your Benches.

Member
Lord Hunt of Chesterton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1233
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I, too, welcome the report. Indeed, it seems to be an almost biennial report. I see from the notes that the first was in 1998-99, the second was in 2001-02, the fifth report was in 2003-04 and this is for 2006-07. I welcome the report, recognising that we...

Member
Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1233
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I begin by thanking my noble friend Lord Selborne for tabling this Motion. The report is a robustly critical analysis of the Government’s proposals. The safe management of radioactive waste is indeed a very important issue, and I am pleased that my noble friend has brought the attention...

Member
Lord Taylor of Holbeach (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1235-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am on the Liberal Democrat Benches, but I have never said that we are unanimous on this subject. As on many other issues, we welcome a plethora of opinions within the party. However, party policy is quite clear: we are anti-nuclear, mainly because of nuclear waste, but...

Member
Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1233-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister suggested that the Liberal Democrats—or any opposition body—in their opposition to new-build, have somehow withheld the geological storage. That storage has not been held up by such opposition; it has been held up for a large number of other reasons.

Member
Lord Redesdale (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1238
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in that respect, I was not referring to the Lib Dems. There are plenty of other people who are anti-nuclear—and that is the end of the argument for them—who say, ““You can’t deal with the waste””. When someone comes along to try to deal with the waste, their...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1238-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, no, I did not say that. One day last week I read the whole transcript of the 11 October committee hearing with Phil Woolas, but I freely admit that I have not read the evidence of Ian Pearson. No, I am simply looking at recommendation 6 of the...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1239-47
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the whole House, and particularly the members of the committee who participated in the preparation of this report, will be grateful to the Minister for his very full and helpful reply. I believe he said that he thought his response might be inadequate, but he should be assured...

Member
Earl of Selborne (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1247-8
House
House of Lords

Lords debate on motion to take note of the report of the Science and Technology Committee on Radioactive Waste Management: An Update (HL 109 2006-07). Agreed to on question.

Lead member
Earl of Selborne
Answering member
Lord Rooker
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs; Science and Technology Committee (HL)
Type
Debates on select committee reports
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1219-48
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the Minister for giving way. This point was pressed on both Mr Pearson and Mr Woolas. We did not receive from either of them as definite an answer as we appear to be getting from the noble Lord. Is he now saying that yes, the Energy...

Member
Lord Jenkin of Roding (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1239
House
House of Lords

My Lords, to reiterate the last point of the noble Lord, Lord Taylor of Holbeach, I am grateful to the noble Earl for bringing the committee’s report before the House. We are not stuck for time; I will not fill all of it, but I am determined to put as...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
29 October 2007
Reference
695 c1238
House
House of Lords
My Lords, France has 14 days of gas storage in an emergency, Germany has 11 and practically every country in Europe has considerably more than the UK, which has only three days, having relied on the North Sea. Given the urgency of this matter and the fact that storage under the sea is much more successful and does not involve planning problems of this type, could it be that we are looking in the wrong place?
Asked by
Lord Howell of Guildford (Conservative)
Oral questions - Supplementary
Status
Answered
Date
18 October 2007
Reference
695 c785
House
House of Lords