Skip to main content

1-20 of 535 results for subject:Intimidation

Subject X
Criminal proceedings

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More
Criminal proceedings (535)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Justice Committee
Date
22 September 2025
House
House of Commons

Clauses 32 to 34 agreed to. Schedule 5 agreed to. Clause 35 agreed to. Clauses 36 and 37 agreed to, as amended. Clauses 38 to 40 agreed to. Schedule 6 agreed to. Clause 41 agreed to, as amended. Committee adjourned.

Lead member
Diana Johnson; Jess Phillips
Answering member
Harriet Cross
Department
Home Office
Type
Public Bill Committee proceedings; Debates on bills
Committee
Crime and Policing Bill Committee
Date
8 April 2025
House
House of Commons
Type
Select Committee written evidence; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Justice Committee
Date
25 April 2023
House
House of Commons

To ask Her Majesty's Government whether they have sent, or will send, observers to the criminal proceedings against former Colombian President, and current Colombian Senator, Alvaro Uribe Velez, including proceedings in the Colombian Supreme Court for alleged interference with witnesses; and whether they have offered assistance in investigations.

Asked by
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Answering body
Foreign and Commonwealth Office
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
22 May 2018
Reference
HL7640
House
House of Lords
Laid by
Mark Lancaster
Department
Ministry of Defence
Type
Statutory instruments
Notes
Supplementary Explanatory Memorandum laid 29 October (UC 40 2015-16)
Date
23 October 2015
Reference
SI 2015/1813
House
House of Lords; House of Commons

I am most grateful to the noble Viscount, Lord Bledisloe, and the noble and learned Baroness for their responses. I agree with him that if a judge is not in a position to make that assessment, and there may be circumstances in which he is not, that poses a difficulty...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1129
House
House of Lords

I am slightly puzzled by this amendment. I fully accept that if the court has a reason to believe the things set out in Amendment No. 6A, that would certainly be a reason why the order should not be made. But surely the main problem about anonymity is that one...

Member
Viscount Bledisloe (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1128
House
House of Lords

We believe that at the moment, as a result of H and C and the current framework, it is possible—the court has the power—to invite the Attorney-General to appoint a special counsel if it is deemed that that is necessary and appropriate. We can already do that. Now we have...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1125-6
House
House of Lords

I do not know what the noble Lord, Lord Kingsland, will do, but I shall seek the opinion of the Committee on my amendment in any event. It is necessary to have a proper framework rather than leaving it to the individual judge to decide the scope and powers of...

Member
Lord Thomas of Gresford (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1126
House
House of Lords

Not for the first time in my political life, I am absolutely bemused by the attitude of the Liberal party. Is the noble Lord seriously suggesting that he will divide the Committee on an amendment when we have had a discussion whose main feature has been comity across the party...

Member
Lord Richard (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1126
House
House of Lords

While I have every sympathy with the amendment, which has been drafted very carefully by the noble Lord, Lord Thomas of Gresford, and to which I was very proud to attach my name, given in the circumstances, and bearing in mind the way in which the noble and learned Baroness...

Member
Lord Elystan-Morgan (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1126
House
House of Lords

In the debate on this group of amendments, I have become something of an innocent bystander—at least, some might say that it is in my self-interest to portray myself in that disguise. As the noble and learned Baroness must know, I am extremely sympathetic to the amendments of both the...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1127
House
House of Lords

had given notice of his intention to move Amendment No. 4C: 4C: Clause 3, page 2, line 32, at end insert— ““( ) For the purposes of considering an application for a witness anonymity order the court may appoint special counsel from the Attorney General’s Panel of Special Counsel to...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1127
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 4D: 4D: Clause 4, page 2, line 36, leave out ““C”” and insert ““D”” The noble Lord said: I shall speak also to the other amendments in this line. The operative amendment in it is Amendment No. 6A. Amendments Nos. 4D, 7D and 8B are consequential upon...

Member
Lord Kingsland (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1127-8
House
House of Lords

The noble and learned Baroness the Attorney-General has not explained what is wrong with Amendment No. 4C. She has simply said that the Government do not accept it. From what she has said so far, I do not understand why. The amendment does not prescribe a statutory scheme; all it...

Member
Lord Lester of Herne Hill (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1125
House
House of Lords

I support what the noble Lord, Lord Elystan-Morgan, has just said. We should not lose sight of the fact that the Bill comes into force on the day it is passed, which could be very swiftly. Judges will have to deal, under the provisions of Clause 10, with proceedings that...

Member
Baroness Mallalieu (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1124
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 2A: 2A: Clause 3, page 2, line 26, leave out subsection (2) and insert— ““(1A) Where an application is made by the prosecutor, the prosecutor— (a) must (unless the court directs otherwise) inform the court of the identity of the witness, but (b) is not required to...

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1121
House
House of Lords

moved Amendment No. 4A: 4A: Clause 3, page 2, line 32, at end insert— ““( ) Nothing in this section is to be taken as restricting any power to make rules of court.”” On Question, amendment agreed to.

Member
Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1121
House
House of Lords

I just hope that we will not have to discuss those matters again.

Member
Lord Lloyd of Berwick (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1120
House
House of Lords

It is scarcely surprising that we have strayed from the grouping. It is necessary to grasp at straws, such as the special counsel, in order to begin to make this legislation look fair to the defence. I do not want to sound churlish because my Amendment No. 2 effectively is...

Member
Baroness Mallalieu (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
15 July 2008
Reference
703 c1120-1
House
House of Lords