Skip to main content

1-20 of 159 results for subject:Meetings

Subject X
Public records

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More
Public records (159)

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

My Hon. Friend, the Minister of State for the Constitution and Devolution (Chloe Smith MP), has today made the following written statement:

Since 2010, the Government has been at the forefront of opening up data to allow Parliament, the public and the media to hold public bodies to account.

Despite the need...

Member
Lord True (Conservative)
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Written statements
Date
15 July 2021
Reference
HLWS183
House
House of Lords

Since 2010, the Government has been at the forefront of opening up data to allow Parliament, the public and the media to hold public bodies to account.

Despite the need to reprioritise resources to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic, central government departments continue to publish core transparency data. Such online transparency...

Member
Chloe Smith (Conservative)
Department
Cabinet Office
Type
Written statements
Date
15 July 2021
Reference
HCWS185
House
House of Commons

I am grateful to the Minister for that explanation. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 296, as amended, agreed to. Clause 297 agreed to. Clause 298 [Representation of corporations at meetings]:

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c126-7GC
House
House of Lords

My noble friend, with respect, may misunderstand. Deloitte & Touche has made its report, the outcome of which I sought to summarise. A copy of it is here. I will make sure that my noble friend gets a copy so that he can peruse its contents. Obviously, there will be the opportunity...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c187GC
House
House of Lords

Would the noble Lord say that that is typical of all companies, or only typical of the companies on the boards of which he sits?

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c184GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps the best thing that I can do to help my noble friend is ensure that he receives a copy of the report by Deloitte & Touche, which the Government commissioned to look into those matters. He will be able to examine the evidence and form his own judgment. That is...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c187GC
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister replies to my noble friend Lord Lea’s highly relevant question, I must say that I am beguiled by what he had to say, but I do not know that he had the evidence to establish those facts. In my intervention I asked him to give further and better particulars of how many...

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c186-7GC
House
House of Lords

I will try to do so in finishing this presentation, but if my noble friend thinks that at the end of the day it is not sufficient, I am happy to write to him. As I was saying, the remuneration committee has to disclose the name of any person who provided advice or...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c185-6GC
House
House of Lords

My noble friend speaks of very high compliance. Will he give further and better particulars?

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c185GC
House
House of Lords

I thank all noble Lords who have participated in the debate, which has been interesting, although it has been wider than some of the detail that we had been looking at previously. I particularly thank my noble friend Lord Lea. Again, he demonstrated the passion that he brings to issues of equality, fairness...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c184-5GC
House
House of Lords

I would not say that it is typical of all companies, because not all companies have remuneration committees. If you want to address that issue, there are solutions that could be quite easily done under the combined code. There is no reason why remuneration committees should have people who are in...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c184GC
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may explain the situation again. The report is not one that, essentially, will be implemented. It reviewed what was happening because of what had gone on in 2003. It comments on the progress that has been made since. Rather than perhaps debate it in the abstract, it would be helpful...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c187GC
House
House of Lords

I want to make it clear on the record that I did not say that the Government do not have a policy on directors’ remuneration. I tried to outline our approach. What I said was that it is not for government to set directors’ pay; that would be wholly inappropriate. I assure my noble friend...

Member
Lord McKenzie of Luton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c188GC
House
House of Lords

The Government will rue the day when they say in public that they have no policy on directors year after year getting six times the pay of other people. That is not a sustainable position. As regards transparency, I am afraid that the noble Lord, Lord Sharman, has elided two different points....

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c187-8GC
House
House of Lords

The answer to that question is very simple. This is referring not to any previous Companies Act, but to the Companies Act which we are talking about. That is as I understand the situation. I will continue with the rest of the answer while someone corrects me if that is wrong. Clause 288 replaces...

Member
Lord Sainsbury of Turville (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c122GC
House
House of Lords

I accept what the Minister said; in fact, he gave a far more thorough response to my inquiry than I expected. The confusion in our minds was because of the wording,"““by any provision of the Companies Acts””," as opposed to this Companies Act. It would have been clearer to the lay man—certainly...

Member
Lord Hodgson of Astley Abbotts (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c122-3GC
House
House of Lords

Our names are added to Clause 322 stand part, in which case there is a complete anomaly. That clause provides that an independent assessor appointed by the company,"““has to attend the meeting at which the poll will be taken””." Since the request for the appointment of an independent assessor may be received...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c133GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to my noble friend. Does he agree that what happens in the top echelons of a company regarding pay and conditions of service is shrouded in mystery so far as the man or woman in the street is concerned? I submit that the information is deliberately withheld. What my...

Member
Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c180GC
House
House of Lords

I too believe that transparency is absolutely essential in these matters. While listening to the debate, I found myself thinking about one of my favourite films, ““Cool Hand Luke””. I do not know if noble Lords have seen it, but by the end of the film Luke has escaped far too many times...

Member
Lord Sharman (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c183-4GC
House
House of Lords

I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 339, as amended, agreed to. Clause 340 [Form of authorising resolution]:

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
1 March 2006
Reference
679 c149-50GC
House
House of Lords