Skip to main content

1-100 of 223 results for subject:Parcelforce

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

Letter dated 19/07/2022 from Lord True to Baroness McIntosh of Pickering and Lord Purvis of Tweed regarding the Procurement Bill committee stage debate (first and second days): how particular entities and services are covered under the Bill and interplay with the Australia free trade agreement: Parcelforce Worldwide, Post Office Limited,...

Deposited by
Cabinet Office
Type
Deposited papers
Date
19 July 2022
Reference
DEP2022-0626
House
House of Lords

To ask the Secretary of State for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy, what discussions his Department has had with representatives of OFCOM on ensuring that (a) Royal Mail Group plc and (b) Parcelforce Worldwide are adapting to recent changes implemented in line with the requirements of the Northern Ireland Protocol...

Asked by
Claire Hanna (Social Democratic & Labour Party)
Answering body
Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy
Type
Written questions
Status
Answered
Date
23 March 2021
Reference
169072
House
House of Commons

It has been reported that Royal Mail is looking to recruit a director to run its UK operations. I would suggest that the next director stand with postal workers on protecting jobs and terms and conditions, and opposing the selling off of Parcelforce. Does the Leader of the House agree,...

Member
Hugh Gaffney (Labour)
Type
Business questions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c1381
House
House of Commons

I am afraid that I think private companies must make their own decisions.

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
3 October 2019
Reference
664 c1381
House
House of Commons

Royal Mail Group is trying to sell off Parcelforce as a separate business. Communication workers will be ready to strike and take action. With an election possibly coming up, will there be a statement from the Government?

Member
Hugh Gaffney (Labour)
Type
Business questions
Date
5 September 2019
Reference
664 c407
House
House of Commons

I am sure that no responsible person would go on strike to interrupt the democratic process of a general election.

Member
Jacob Rees-Mogg (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
5 September 2019
Reference
664 c1116
House
House of Commons

I thank the Minister for her response, which I am a little disappointed by but hope she will reflect on. I reserve the right to bring this matter back on Report. I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 9 withdrawn. . Amendment 10 Moved by

Member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c46
House
House of Lords

I am tempted, especially by the last speaker. I am sure that every Liberal candidate in Scotland will welcome his intervention, but I can assure noble Lords that every Labour candidate will welcome it even more. The noble Lord mentioned the ““outer”” areas. Such contempt—such arrogance and such an unctuous...

Member
Lord McAvoy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c114-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the purpose of this amendment is to ensure that the proceeds of any sale of Royal Mail are invested in the post office network and the delivery of the universal postal service. In our debate in this House at Second Reading, the Minister explained what would happen to...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c63-4
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I tend to agree with my noble friend Lady Kramer on this. Although what comes out of the discussion on this amendment will be valuable to our future discussions, as it is it rather puts the cart before the horse. As far as the noble Baroness, Lady Drake,...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c70-1
House
House of Lords

No, I actually said that the noble Lord, instead of making party-political, snide comments, should actually learn the facts. The facts are that the Royal Mail at the moment is seriously under pressure delivering to Norwood Green and Hampstead, not to outer Wales, which is easy for Royal Mail to...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c114
House
House of Lords

I cannot say that we are completely satisfied with the noble Baroness’s response. Nevertheless, we shall reflect on it between now and Report. In those circumstances, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 8 withdrawn. Amendment 9 Moved by

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c44
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I fully appreciate the sentiment behind the amendment. The name ““Royal Mail”” has been synonymous with the delivery of the postal service in the United Kingdom for hundreds of years. In fact, the noble Lord, Lord Kennedy, has told us the date on which it was established, and...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c44-5
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I normally try to avoid rising before the Minister’s response. Although the noble Lord does not know my name, I think that he is the noble Lord, Lord McAvoy. One of the conventions in this House is that if you are going to be rude to somebody, as...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c116
House
House of Lords

The noble suggested that people were not telling the truth. I do not know where he has been this evening—perhaps he has had a very good dinner. However, it is quite improper without any evidence to suggest that either I or the noble Lord, Lord Low—he followed both of us—were...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c116
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not wish to get involved in this particular exchange, but I declare an interest as a Member of the Northern Ireland Assembly. The point that the noble Lord, Lord McAvoy, makes is valid. Like it or not, people who are furthest away from the centre in...

Member
Lord Empey (Ulster Unionist Party)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c116
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I say to the noble Lord, Lord McAvoy, that I remember, not that long ago when we were standing not that far apart on the Floor in the other place, when he whipped his rather unwilling troops in to vote for the closure of 4,000 local post offices....

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c117-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, somewhat later than planned, I rise to support both Amendment 16 in the name of the noble Lord, Lord Low, and Amendment 16A in the name of my noble friend Lord Touhig. We can be proud that the universal service includes the six day a week, price goes...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c118-9
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I suppose that I ought to start by saying that I live in Cornwall, which may put the Committee’s mind at rest. I have some idea about the differences of living in Cornwall and in the centre of London. Indeed, I apologise, for so does the noble Baroness,...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c119-20
House
House of Lords

I am sure that the Minister is right about the attentiveness of the Bill team in the Box; they all look exceedingly alert to me—bright eyed and bushy tailed. I just want to be sure what we are seeking, as it is not the guarantee that the universal service will...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c120
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for expressing that more clearly than I did. The Government have already produced an impact assessment on the proposals in the Bill. It looked at the impact of the proposals on all parts of the United Kingdom. The universality of the universal postal service means...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c121
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am grateful to the Minister for her full reply and to all noble Lords who have spoken. At times I felt caught in the crossfire to the right and the left of me when I was simply moving a simple amendment designed to secure a fair deal...

Member
Lord Low of Dalston (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c121-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 12 wishes to direct any proceeds received from a sale of shares to investment in the post office network and the universal postal service. I certainly agree that the both the Post Office and the universal service require long-term funding certainty if we are to secure both...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c65
House
House of Lords

Before the Minister sits down, will she answer my point? I said that you could maintain a universal service but price it out of the market by making it unattractive to users because of the price.

Member
Lord Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c60
House
House of Lords

I must intervene before the noble Lord withdraws the amendment. I am a student of Machiavelli and I have always regarded the noble Lord, Lord Lea of Crondall, as the model of The Prince.

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c105
House
House of Lords

12A: Clause 2, page 2, line 3, at end insert— ““( ) a schedule of assets held by Royal Mail Holdings plc and used for the provision of directly managed Post Office branches which also details— (i) a schedule of those assets which will be transferred to the Royal Mail...

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c66
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her response, which is rather depressing in its rejection of our proposal. My reference to the pension deficit fund dealt with the assets. Tagged on to the end of that discussion was a comment that, in return for obtaining the assets, the Government were also...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c65-6
House
House of Lords

12: Clause 2, page 2, line 3, at end insert— ““( ) that the receipts of the sale will be used exclusively for the purpose of investment in the Post Office network of branches and future investment in the delivery of the universal postal service by a Royal Mail company...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c63
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Clarke of Hampstead, could never offend me.

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c61
House
House of Lords

That is a bonus. I will briefly try to answer some of the points. The noble Lord, Lord Skelmersdale, was the first person to speak in the debate. I recognise that he is a most important person to the people whom I worked with all my working life: he is...

Member
Lord Clarke of Hampstead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c61-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this amendment directs the Secretary of State to ensure that in any relevant disposal there will be a guarantee that the existing rights of the workforce recognition are maintained. There are two themes at work here. The first is that the workforce by its own efforts has unionised...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c94-6
House
House of Lords

13: Clause 2, page 2, line 3, at end insert— ““( ) The Secretary of State will ensure that any relevant disposal guarantees that the existing rights of recognition of employees are maintained.””

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c94
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I speak as a former chair of ACAS. One of the joys of ACAS is that I probably know more about the employment relations of most industries in this country than anyone else; one of the frustrations is that I follow the ACAS tradition of not speaking about...

Member
Baroness Donaghy (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c96
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Baroness, particularly for her last few sentences; clearly we may well come back to the matter on Clause 4. However, I did not find the rest of what she said very reassuring. I am grateful to the noble Baroness for referring to the legal...

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c73-4
House
House of Lords

I fear that the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, may have misunderstood me; I obviously was not clear. If I remember correctly, the report comes after the Minister has taken the decision but before the actual disposal. After the fact of the disposal—that is what the noble Lord is now discussing—a...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c74
House
House of Lords

But, my Lords, the report to Parliament provided for in Clause 2 is a necessary stage for the Secretary of State to go through before the disposal actually takes place. I agree about the decision in principle; I do not seek to delay that or take things out of sequence,...

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c74
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support the amendment in the name of my noble friend Lord Whitty. A couple of noble Lords have suggested that these discussions, particularly in relation to the assets, are putting carts before horses but I am not sure about that. We are really talking about the transfer...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c71-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 12A seeks to require the Secretary of State to include in his report to Parliament details of the assets held by Royal Mail Holdings plc and asset transfers between Royal Mail and Post Office Ltd. It also requires the Secretary of State to report on the terms...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c72-3
House
House of Lords

I think that the answer to that question is yes. In fact I am sure that the answer is yes. The universal postal service is protected by Parliament throughout this regulatory framework, not by the Government’s ownership of Royal Mail. I hope that that gives some comfort to my noble...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c58-60
House
House of Lords

My Lords, perhaps I may briefly interrupt my noble friend. Does that mean that the original purchaser of Royal Mail will be bound by the UPS?

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c58
House
House of Lords

On maintaining the universal service, as I said, Ofcom will be watching like a hawk to make sure that there is a fair balance between Royal Mail and the consumers of the products that Royal Mail produces. Ofcom has had a good reputation in the past and we feel confident...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c61
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I start by thanking all those who have taken part in what has been a useful exchange of views on a whole range of subjects. Two noble Lords considered that my earlier comments were more suited to a Second Reading debate. I carefully looked at the background to...

Member
Lord Clarke of Hampstead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c61
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Postal Services Act 2000 ““liberalised”” the postal service. There are now, I think, 49 licensed postal operators in addition to Royal Mail, which is also licensed. If that number of people were willing to become postal operators, they must have expected it to be possible to do...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c54
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I apologise for not being in my place on the previous day or at the beginning of the Second Reading-style speech made by the noble Lord, Lord Clarke, which of course I would have missed at Second Reading because he did not deliver it. Am I not right...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c54
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I support this amendment. At this juncture, I am happy to share the same analysis, if not completely then certainly key parts of it, with my noble friends Lord Clarke and Lord Hoyle. Like the noble Lord, Lord Brooke, I confess that I was not on the side...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c55-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, before the Minister responds, could I make one point that I think is important? In the context of a number of comments by noble Lords, there is an assumption that the cost of the universal service obligation bears most heavily on remote areas. However, the figures for Royal...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c58
House
House of Lords

My Lords, we have had a great debate across the Committee, which has been provoked by the noble Lord, Lord Clarke, whose credentials are immaculate in this area. I missed hearing him in the debate on Second Reading because he was not able to be here for it, so we...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c58
House
House of Lords

May I finish what I am saying? We are in Committee; the noble Lord does not have to interrupt me. The noble Lords are quite right: in the world under the Labour Government, they successfully sold off all sorts of things in tranches. However, we are not talking about the...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c102
House
House of Lords

I—

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c102
House
House of Lords

It is not for me to respond to this; I am sure that the noble Baroness can do so more eloquently than me. But anybody who thinks, in the Royal Mail’s current circumstances, that there can be an IPO, is living in a total fantasy world. In the world in...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c102
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the noble Lord has sat down. Did I hear him say that a sale through an IPO per se was unlikely? Clearly there is a difference between a sale through an IPO and a sale to an individual but, as my noble friend Lord Young and I have...

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c102
House
House of Lords

Yes, it was in 2008, when Hooper gave an update—

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c102
House
House of Lords

If the noble Lord will allow me, it was the Hooper report that said that the most likely presumption of going forward was an IPO, and that was very recent.

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c102
House
House of Lords

Hooper said in 2010 that the situation had worsened, although he acknowledged that things were happening at Royal Mail which were a great improvement. The big snag with an IPO is that it does not bring Moya Greene’s £2 billion. The noble Lord, Lord Clarke of Hampstead, would certainly buy...

Member
Viscount Eccles (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c102-3
House
House of Lords

2010.

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c102
House
House of Lords

I cannot say how much I respect the views of the noble Lord, Lord Lea of Crondall, and the noble Lord, Lord Young of Norwood Green, but I have to say that from what they have just said they are living in fantasy land. We are faced with a situation...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c101-2
House
House of Lords

I take compliments of that type. I do not receive many compliments and I shall take that as a compliment and have it framed. In conclusion, a point of analytical disagreement has come out in the past 20 minutes such that I am pretty sure that my colleagues and I...

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c106
House
House of Lords

My Lords, it will not surprise the House that I will in due course withdraw the amendment pro tem, but that in no way assumes that our arguments have been overwhelmed by the firepower of the noble Lord, Lord Razzall, or the Minister. The Liberal Democrats must have been reading...

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c105
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this has been a stimulating evening all round. Amendment 14 is a sister amendment to Amendment 2 which we debated last week. Amendment 13A provides a new twist on the disposal of shares in Royal Mail and seeks to place time constraints on the disposal of shares specifically...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c104-5
House
House of Lords

The noble Lord, Lord Young, and I seem to have discovered a knack of talking past each other. I have no criticism of anyone raising the issues—in fact, I think it is good to have the warning that past sales of assets have not really achieved the maximum price that...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c103
House
House of Lords

I do not normally intervene; indeed, I am impelled to do so only by the contribution of the noble Lord, Lord Razzall. The noble Baroness, Lady Kramer, compounded the situation by saying that this was not the place to discuss this. I reject that. This is absolutely the right place...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c103
House
House of Lords

I am perfectly happy to sit down if that is helpful.

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c103
House
House of Lords

We are in Committee, you do not have to interrupt.

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c103
House
House of Lords

My Lords—

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c103
House
House of Lords

Did the noble Lord suggest that the noble Lord, Lord Low, and I were somehow misleading the House by not telling the truth in this matter? I take exception to that. I am sorry that he has this metropolitan view. I know that his party is not that strong in...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c114
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I do not want to intrude in the debate on this amendment, but unfortunately the noble Lords, Lord Touhig and Lord Low of Dalston, were not in their places when I made this point earlier. If we are to preserve the reputation of this House for knowing the...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c113-4
House
House of Lords

16: Clause 2, page 2, line 17, at end insert— ““(6) Prior to any disposal of shares in Royal Mail, the Secretary of State shall consult service user groups including small businesses, pensioners, people with disabilities and people in rural and remote areas. (7) Following the consultation in subsection (6)...

Member
Lord Low of Dalston (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c109
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for that response. We seem to be placing a great deal of stress on hopes and aspirations about what will happen after the sale—other noble Lords picked up on this, I think—and very little on what many people in the country would regard as sensible and...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c108-9
House
House of Lords

In supporting the amendment tabled by the noble Lord, Lord Low, I shall speak to my Amendment 16A. The Bill does little to ensure accountability to the devolved Administrations in the United Kingdom. Yet we must recognise the vital services provided by the Royal Mail to the whole of Great...

Member
Lord Touhig (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c111-3
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 16 is designed to strengthen the rights of users of postal services. As has been seen in the past, with privatisation and a greater focus on commercial imperatives, it is all too easy for the most vulnerable users of services to be put at the greatest disadvantage....

Member
Lord Low of Dalston (Crossbench)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c109-11
House
House of Lords

15: Clause 2, page 2, line 12, leave out subsection (5) and insert— ““( ) In order to ensure that it remains a single company, for the purpose of this Part ““Royal Mail company”” means the company that provides the universal postal service.””

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c106
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I believe that the intended effect of Amendment 15, in the names of the noble Lords, Lord Young, Lord Stevenson and Lord Tunnicliffe, is to seek to ensure that Royal Mail remains a single company providing the universal postal service and that it is the only universal service...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c108
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thought that, following that interruption, we should have a few seconds of silence to gather our thoughts in case we are interrupted. This amendment restricts the issue or transfer of shares in Royal Mail to the whole company by defining a ““Royal Mail company”” as the company...

Member
Lord Stevenson of Balmacara (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c106-8
House
House of Lords

Speak for England.

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c100
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the purpose of Amendment 14 is to provide for the disposal of shares to take place in tranches or batches rather than all at once. In keeping with our previous amendment, the batches are at 30 per cent and 19 per cent, to maintain Royal Mail in overall...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c100-1
House
House of Lords

13A: Clause 2, page 2, line 3, at end insert— ““(3A) In the event that a sale is made by an initial public offering, a relevant disposal may only take place if the conditions in subsections (3B) and (3C) are met. (3B) Shares representing no more than 30% of the...

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c98
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for her response, even if it did not go as far as I would have liked. I also thank my noble friend Lady Donaghy for contributing to this debate and for pointing out that at a time of great change—and moving to a privatised environment will...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c98
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendment 13 seeks to place a duty on the Secretary of State to ensure that employees’ existing rights of recognition are maintained. I am not sure whether the amendment fits neatly into Clause 2, which is intended to place a duty on the Secretary of State to report...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c97-8
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I am afraid that we now see week after week in some newspapers—I would include under that heading a magazine such as the Economist—thinly disguised attacks on collective bargaining. We cannot debate that topic in its totality this evening, but I refer the Committee to the central point....

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c96-7
House
House of Lords

My apologies, I shall speak to it.

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c99
House
House of Lords

I beg to move the amendment standing in my name.

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c99
House
House of Lords

My Lords, Amendments 13A and 14 cover two complementary points; I shall deal with the first aspect and my noble friend Lord Young of Norwood Green will deal with the second. The key words in Amendment 13A are ““initial public offering””. In the event that a sale is by means...

Member
Lord Lea of Crondall (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c99
House
House of Lords

My Lords, does not the dispute that has just taken place make it clear that this House and the other place are not the appropriate organisations for detailed discussions on how to do a disposal of shares? Obviously there are many different views, but this is not the kind of...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c103
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the Minister in the other place, the honourable Ed Davey, has tried on several occasions to reassure stakeholders by arguing that both Royal Mail and the Post Office want an extended inter-business agreement. In Committee, he said: "““I refer the Committee to what the chief executive of Royal...

Member
Baroness Drake (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c68-70
House
House of Lords

The comments of the noble Lord, Lord Whitty, arouse some questions in my mind, and this seems the appropriate time to raise them with the House. In an earlier Committee debate, several Members of the House talked about how important it is that the Minister’s report comes as soon as...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c68
House
House of Lords

My Lords, this is a fairly straightforward amendment, and I am sure that the Government will have no great difficulty in accepting it. The noble Baroness will know that I have expressed some scepticism about the changes of ownership proposed by the Government. However, I have supported the proposals by...

Member
Lord Whitty (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c66-7
House
House of Lords

Does the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, think it would be appropriate for the name ““Royal Mail”” to be owned by a foreign company that had bought the postal services—indeed, a foreign company from a republic?

Member
Lord Swinfen (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c46
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I say to the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, that we intend to put safeguards in place to ensure that the royal associations are used by Royal Mail respectfully and appropriately at all times. We have not yet finalised how these will be structured, but they could, for example,...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c46
House
House of Lords

I would have spoken immediately after my noble friend Lord Kennedy, except that I imagined—wrongly—that there was no answer to his point and that the noble Baroness would give way. It is unsatisfactory that when a sale is to be made, there is no firm or unfirm indication in the...

Member
Lord Borrie (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c45
House
House of Lords

9: Clause 2, page 2, line 3, at end insert— ““( ) the means by which the name Royal Mail is to be protected and used by the universal postal service provider.””

Member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c44
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I hope that I will get a favourable response from the Minister as my amendment should cause the Government no problems whatever. It has no effect on the thrust of the Bill and its objectives should be welcomed by noble Lords on all sides of the Committee. In...

Member
Lord Kennedy of Southwark (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c44
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I thank the noble Lord, Lord Young, for his most helpful opening words. Telling me that his intention is to enable those on these Benches to make a better Bill is welcome. The amendments seek to insert additional reporting requirements into the Bill on the Government’s objectives for...

Member
Baroness Wilcox (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c43-4
House
House of Lords

8: Clause 2, page 2, line 2, leave out paragraphs (a) and (b) and insert— ““( ) the principal objectives intended to be achieved by any disposal, ( ) the extent to which the Secretary of State considers that the disposal will achieve those objectives, and ( ) the expected...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c41
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I shall also speak to Amendment 11. These amendments concern the report that the Secretary of State will be required to lay before Parliament after deciding to dispose of Royal Mail, whether through a trade sale or an IPO share sale. We have already put on record the...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c41-3
House
House of Lords

Postal Services Bill. Lords committee stage second day. Clause 2: Report on decision to dispose of shares in a Royal Mail company etc, debated and agreed to.

Department
Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Type
Committee of the Whole House (HL); Debates on bills
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c41-74, c94-122
House
House of Lords

My Lords, I first declare the interest that I declared many times when my party was trying to push through the disposal of Royal Mail. I am a former postman, a former trade union official, a former trustee of the Post Office pension fund, and I have had a few...

Member
Lord Clarke of Hampstead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c46-51
House
House of Lords

10: Clause 2, page 2, line 3, at end insert— ““( ) how the Secretary of State will ensure that the provision of universal postal services will be maintained following the disposal; ( ) how much of the Royal Mail company’s modernisation budget— ( ) has been spent, and (...

Member
Lord Clarke of Hampstead (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c46
House
House of Lords

I pay tribute to my noble friend Lord Clarke of Hampstead. No one else has more knowledge of the Royal Mail and the postal service than him, as he displayed. He may have gone wide of the amendment—he was right to do so—in exposing the history that has led us...

Member
Lord Hoyle (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c51-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, as the Committee knows, I look at the Bill from a totally different perspective from that of the noble Lord, Lord Clarke of Hampstead. I look at it from the perspective of a user of Royal Mail and of the universal postal service that is contained within that...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c51
House
House of Lords

My Lords, the statements made by the noble Lord, Lord Clarke, expressed the distress that is widely felt and which we all understand. He got to the crux of the matter when he said that a previous Government had liberalised the market in mail without first putting Royal Mail on...

Member
Baroness Kramer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
14 March 2011
Reference
726 c52-3
House
House of Lords