Skip to main content

2361-2380 of 2,443 results for subject:Subscriptions

Type

+ Legislation (7) + Bills (1) + Public bills (1) + Private members' bills (1)
-
Presentation bills (1)
+ Delegated legislation (6)
-
Statutory instruments (6)
+ Members' contributions (2,069)
-
Business questions (2)
-
Oral answers to questions (22)
-
Oral question time interventions (1)
-
Oral questions (21)
-
Proceeding contributions (2,025)
+ Parliamentary committees (23) + Committee proceedings (20)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (7)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (5)
-
Select Committee reports (1)
-
Select Committee reports (Government responses) (1)
-
Select Committee written evidence (4)
+ Parliamentary papers (23)
-
Command papers (1)
-
Consultation papers (2)
-
Consultation papers (Government responses) (1)
-
Deposited papers (14)
-
House of Commons papers (7)
-
House of Lords papers (1)
-
Impact assessments (2)
+ Parliamentary proceedings (40) + Debates (34)
-
Backbench debates (1)
+ Committee proceedings (20)
-
Committee of the Whole House (HL) (5)
-
Delegated Legislation Committee proceedings (3)
-
Public Bill Committee proceedings (7)
-
Select Committee oral evidence (5)
+ Legislative debates (27)
-
Debates on bills (21)
-
Debates on delegated legislation (6)
+ Statements (6) + Oral statements (1)
-
Ministerial statements (1)
-
Written statements (5)
+ Parliamentary questions (323)
-
Business questions (2)
-
Oral questions (21)
-
Written questions (300)
+ Research briefings (8) + Commons Briefing papers (6)
-
Briefing papers on bills (1)
+ Lords Library Briefings (1)
-
Lords Library Briefings - Bills (1)
-
POSTnotes (1)

House

Session

Year

Department

More

Member

More

Primary member

More

Answering member

More

Legislative stage

Legislation

More

Subject

More

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

What connection does that have? Surely, if there was a connection, it would be with the gentlemen opposite, who have been supported by the Sun newspaper for the past X number of years until a short time ago.

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c471
House
House of Lords

That is very easy, because it is proposed by BSkyB.

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c471
House
House of Lords

Will the noble Lord tell me why the Conservative Party would support the amendment?

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c471
House
House of Lords

55: Clause 4, page 6, leave out lines 23 and 24

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c471
House
House of Lords

I do not agree, and no doubt BSkyB will support me, but I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 54 withdrawn. Amendment 55 Moved by

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c471
House
House of Lords

If the noble Lord, Lord Razzall, is being all inclusive he can leave the Government out, because we are not going to accept the amendment on rational grounds that have nothing to do with extraneous factors. Each copyright infringement report will identify a specific infringement of a specific copyright work...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c471
House
House of Lords

The Minister will be relieved that this is simply a probing amendment. It seeks to discover in new subsection (3)(d) what the Government think, ""any other requirement of the initial obligations code"," is likely to cover. This amendment was drafted before we had any idea what was likely to be...

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c471-2
House
House of Lords

My Lords, in view of the hour and the number of Members who have indicated that they wish to speak on the next item of business, the usual channels have agreed that it may be for the convenience of the House if we do not resume proceedings on the Bill...

Member
Lord Faulkner of Worcester (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c474-5
House
House of Lords

I am not sure the Minister quite answered my question about examples of any requirements but I will look again at the code. In the mean time, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment 55 withdrawn. Amendment 56 Moved by

Member
Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c472
House
House of Lords

I am grateful to the noble Baroness for indicating that this is a probing amendment. We do not think the amendment would improve the Bill since, while it attempts to make the contents of a copyright infringement report clearer, it would have the effect of reducing the flexibility afforded by...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c472
House
House of Lords

Perhaps I may pick up the noble Lord on Amendment 56. I would have more confidence in his reply if it were not the case that the details of tens of thousands of internet subscribers have already been passed to copyright owners on the basis of entirely black-box evidence. No...

Member
Lord Lucas (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c474
House
House of Lords

I thank the Minister for his response. Having heard the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, I wonder whether the Minister’s promise to me is rather the same as his earlier promise to me of an earldom. However, I will, of course, look in Hansard at what he said. In the mean...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c474
House
House of Lords

That is the whole purpose of the Bill—to actually guard against it and to identify to people the dangers involved in not complying with the law. The noble Lord will recognise that I identified in my response that the code of practice, backed by Ofcom and the Secretary of State’s...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c474
House
House of Lords

Amendments 56 and 57 touch on quite a fundamental point referred to by the noble Lord, Lord Lucas, at Second Reading about the beginning of this clause. It is quite clear that currently copyright owners, through their solicitors, are in danger of being accused of collecting data not necessarily in...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c472-3
House
House of Lords

56: Clause 4, page 6, line 24, at end insert "; and ( ) includes a sworn statement by the person making the report that the information collected has been obtained in compliance with all relevant laws, including data protection and privacy laws, and by persons entitled to gather such...

Member
Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c472
House
House of Lords

At the end of a reasonably testing sitting, it is my great pleasure to indicate that I am broadly in sympathy with the contributions of both noble Lords, Lord Razzall and Lord Howard of Rising. I am not going to accept the amendment but I will indicate why I think...

Member
Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c473-4
House
House of Lords

I have a great deal of support for these amendments. It is important that any internet service provider has confidence that, if they are to take action based on the receipt of a copyright infringement report, the evidence that it includes has been obtained legally and that, if they make...

Member
Lord Howard of Rising (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c473
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Baroness for her contribution. We share her concern about rural access. The aim of the Digital Britain report is to ensure that we have a universal service offered on broadband. I have not got with me information on when the national plan will be published, unfortunately....

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c413
House
House of Lords

I thank the noble Lord for reminding us of what I think is referred to as Moore’s law, by which the number of transistors on a chip is expected to double every 18 months. I think Moore predicted that some time in the mid-1970s, and it has been proved to...

Member
Lord Young of Norwood Green (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c413
House
House of Lords

The Minister mentioned the national plan. I remind your Lordships that in 2002 we launched an inquiry, which I chaired for the Select Committee on Science and Technology, into the microprocessing industry. We produced a report called Chips for Everything, in which we looked very closely at the impact that...

Member
Lord Wade of Chorlton (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
12 January 2010
Reference
716 c413
House
House of Lords