Skip to main content

1-20 of 26 results for legtitle:"Gangmasters (Licensing Conditions) Rules 2006"

Type

House

Session

Year

Department

Member

Primary member

Answering member

Legislative stage

Legislation

Subject

Publisher


Show detailed: On Off
Results: 10 20 50 100
Sort by: Newest first Oldest first

I beg to move the Motion standing in my name on the Order Paper. Moved, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Gangmasters (Licensing Conditions) Rules 2006 (S.I. 2006/660) [30th Report from the Merits Committee].—(Baroness Byford.) On Question, Motion agreed to.

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c69GC
House
House of Lords

Gangmasters (Licensing Conditions) Rules (SI 2006/660). Lords motion to Consider. Agreed to on question (formal). Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses room). (Debated with SI 2006/658).

Lead member
Baroness Byford
Type
Legislative formal proceedings
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c69GC
House
House of Lords

May I have some clarification on what the Minister has said in the past couple of minutes? Does it apply to EU citizens alone, or to citizens outside the EU as well?

Member
Lord Livsey of Talgarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c68GC
House
House of Lords

That is not allowed in this place.

Member
Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c67GC
House
House of Lords

I strongly welcome the Minister here today. We have worked together across the Table many times. It is strange to think of Denis Howell; I am sure he would have enjoyed the cup final in Cardiff last Saturday. It was a sunny day, and I must tell the Minister, a Birmingham man, that...

Member
Lord Livsey of Talgarth (Liberal Democrat)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c63-4GC
House
House of Lords

I agree with my noble friend Lady Byford and the noble Lord, Lord Livsey, that these regulations are desperately needed and will greatly improve the law. Members of the Grand Committee will know that I have been involved in horticulture all my working life. I started self-employment in horticulture as a sole trader. Many of...

Member
Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c64-5GC
House
House of Lords

The seasonal workers scheme was operating, so in that sense the Home Office set rules on numbers, and I dealt with that when I was there. But there were no conditions or benefits of employment for those people at that time. This legislation is new for the industry.

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c69GC
House
House of Lords

It is for one worker per day, but if clarification is needed I shall write to the noble Baroness.

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c68GC
House
House of Lords

I will do my best to answer the last question, which is wholly reasonable. I am grateful for the contributions of noble Lords. One of them took me back more than 40 years. I was a young tool-making apprentice in Birmingham in 1960 when I saw an advert in the paper: ““Holiday with a difference: fruit picking in...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c65-7GC
House
House of Lords

The Minister is telling me something that I did not know because I thought he was English-based; there we are. It is a very good organisation. It has been going through fairly difficult times regarding the future of the scheme, as has the National Farmers’ Union with its similar scheme. I had assumed...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c60-3GC
House
House of Lords

Actually there is another one: me.

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c60GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for that clarification. However, I ask the Minister to speed it up as much as possible because we need this regulation. I welcome it and I know that the industry welcomes it. We want to see good gangmasters who operate fair systems, and we want to make sure that rogue gangmasters...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c69GC
House
House of Lords

I am very grateful to all noble Lords who have taken part in this debate. My noble friend Lord Skelmersdale will be very pleased that he does not find himself in difficulty. I am grateful, too, to the Minister for his response. I am still quite perplexed that the legislation has taken as long...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c69GC
House
House of Lords

It applies to everybody; no distinction is made, otherwise there would be a loophole for massive exploitation. Obviously, gangmasters must be licensed anyway, so we hope that there will only be good gangmasters and that they will not exploit people. But the regulations must cover everybody; you cannot send people...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c68GC
House
House of Lords

I would be grateful.

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c68GC
House
House of Lords

Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations (SI 2006/658). Lords debate on motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses room). (Debated with SI 2006/662, SI 2006/660)

Lead member
Baroness Byford
Answering member
Lord Rooker
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Type
Debates on delegated legislation
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c60-9GC
House
House of Lords

I am grateful for that response, but does that mean that that is the only occasion—that it is a first and a one-off? I know that employers can take on other workers on subsequent days, but do they have to do it every day for the same worker?

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c68GC
House
House of Lords

No, I am not striking on this. The Committee will agree, however, that flexibility should not be provided at the expense of the workers. That is the point. Licensing will oblige gangmasters to operate their business in an ethical and legal manner. It will also create a clear distinction between legal...

Member
Lord Rooker (Labour)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c67-8GC
House
House of Lords

rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations 2006 (S.I. 2006/658) [30th Report from the Merits Committee]. The noble Baroness said: I shall speak also to the Gangmasters (Appeals) Regulations 2006 and the Gangmasters (Licensing Conditions) Rules 2006 because most of my points are...

Member
Baroness Byford (Conservative)
Type
Proceeding contributions
Date
16 May 2006
Reference
682 c60GC
House
House of Lords
Type
Select Committee reports; House of Commons papers; House of Lords papers; Parliamentary committees
Committee
Joint Committee on Statutory Instruments
Date
10 May 2006
Reference
HC 35-xxv 2005-06;HL 181 2005-06
House
House of Commons; House of Lords