Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Skelmersdale (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 May 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations 2006.


Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations 2006

I agree with my noble friend Lady Byford and the noble Lord, Lord Livsey, that these regulations are desperately needed and will greatly improve the law. Members of the Grand Committee will know that I have been involved in horticulture all my working life. I started self-employment in horticulture as a sole trader. Many of the gangmasters we are talking about in these regulations, whether involved in shellfish picking, horticulture or farming, will be sole traders. Rule 3(1) provides that a gangmaster’s licence will be granted only to a business. In law, does the word ““business”” cover the operations of a sole trader? If not, the good gangmasters and those who employ the services of a gangmaster could be unfairly disadvantaged. One would not want that to happen.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c64-5GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Appeals Applications Agriculture Age Casual workers Administrative delays Employment Licensing Enforcement Gangmasters Horticulture Working conditions Seasonal workers Students Gangmasters Licensing Authority Cockles
Legislation
Gangmasters (Licensing Conditions) Rules 2006
Gangmasters (Appeals) Regulations 2006
Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations 2006
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk