Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Rooker (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 16 May 2006. It occurred during Debates on delegated legislation on Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations 2006.


Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations 2006

It applies to everybody; no distinction is made, otherwise there would be a loophole for massive exploitation. Obviously, gangmasters must be licensed anyway, so we hope that there will only be good gangmasters and that they will not exploit people. But the regulations must cover everybody; you cannot send people out to work under different conditions just because they are of different nationalities. They have to work as a team, as well. I was asked why we did not do the shellfish regulations first. It was hoped that one set of licensing regulation conditions could fit both farming and shellfish gathering, but on consultation that proved not to be the case. We pushed ahead with farming so that we avoided delaying licensing any more than was necessary. I shall come back to any points that I have not covered—especially the point about paragraph 13 of the schedule that the noble Baroness asked me about.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c68GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Appeals Applications Agriculture Age Casual workers Administrative delays Employment Licensing Enforcement Gangmasters Horticulture Working conditions Seasonal workers Students Gangmasters Licensing Authority Cockles
Legislation
Gangmasters (Licensing Conditions) Rules 2006
Gangmasters (Appeals) Regulations 2006
Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations 2006
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk