Parliamentary Search

Debates on delegated legislation on Tuesday, 16 May 2006, in the House of Lords, led by Baroness Byford. The answering member was Lord Rooker.

Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations 2006

Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations (SI 2006/658). Lords debate on motion to consider. Agreed to on question. Grand Committee off the floor of the House (Moses room). (Debated with SI 2006/662, SI 2006/660)

Secondary information

Type
Parliamentary proceeding
Reference
682 c60-9GC 
Session
2005-06
Department
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Related items
Gangmasters (Licensing Conditions) Rules 2006
Monday, 13 March 2006
Statutory instruments
House of Commons
House of Lords
Gangmasters (Appeals) Regulations 2006
Monday, 13 March 2006
Statutory instruments
House of Commons
House of Lords
Show all related items (6)
Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations 2006
Monday, 13 March 2006
Statutory instruments
House of Commons
House of Lords
Proceeding contributions
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 682 c68GC (Link to this contribution) May I have some clarification on what the Minister has said in the past couple of minutes? Does it a...
Show all contributions (16)
Lord Rooker | 682 c69GC (Link to this contribution) The seasonal workers scheme was operating, so in that sense the Home Office set rules on numbers, an...
Lord Rooker | 682 c68GC (Link to this contribution) It is for one worker per day, but if clarification is needed I shall write to the noble Baroness.
Lord Rooker | 682 c65-7GC (Link to this contribution) I will do my best to answer the last question, which is wholly reasonable. I am grateful for the con...
Baroness Byford | 682 c60-3GC (Link to this contribution) The Minister is telling me something that I did not know because I thought he was English-based; the...
Lord Rooker | 682 c60GC (Link to this contribution) Actually there is another one: me.
Lord Livsey of Talgarth | 682 c63-4GC (Link to this contribution) I strongly welcome the Minister here today. We have worked together across the Table many times. It ...
Baroness Byford | 682 c69GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for that clarification. However, I ask the Minister to speed it up as much as possible...
Baroness Byford | 682 c69GC (Link to this contribution) I am very grateful to all noble Lords who have taken part in this debate. My noble friend Lord Skelm...
Lord Skelmersdale | 682 c64-5GC (Link to this contribution) I agree with my noble friend Lady Byford and the noble Lord, Lord Livsey, that these regulations are...
Lord Rooker | 682 c68GC (Link to this contribution) It applies to everybody; no distinction is made, otherwise there would be a loophole for massive exp...
Baroness Byford | 682 c68GC (Link to this contribution) I am grateful for that response, but does that mean that that is the only occasion—that it is a firs...
Lord Rooker | 682 c67-8GC (Link to this contribution) No, I am not striking on this. The Committee will agree, however, that flexibility should not be pro...
Baroness Byford | 682 c60GC (Link to this contribution) rose to move, That the Grand Committee do report to the House that it has considered the Gangmasters...
Subjects
Appeals Applications Agriculture Age Casual workers Administrative delays Employment Licensing Enforcement Gangmasters Horticulture Working conditions Seasonal workers Students Gangmasters Licensing Authority Cockles
Legislation
Gangmasters (Licensing Conditions) Rules 2006
Gangmasters (Appeals) Regulations 2006
Gangmasters Licensing (Exclusions) Regulations 2006
Link
View this Parliamentary proceeding on www.publications.parliament.uk