That this House notes the resolution of 19th March 1997 on Ministerial Accountability to Parliament that 'it is of paramount importance that Ministers give accurate and truthful information to Parliament, correcting any inadvertent error at the earliest opportunity' and that 'Ministers who knowingly mislead Parliament will be expected to offer their resignation to the Prime Minister'; and further notes that the Chancellor of the Exchequer, during exchanges on the pre-Budget Statement on 9th November, misled the House when he said that 'We have just heard this afternoon from the Shadow Chancellor that he opposed putting that ??40 billion in ... to health and education' when in fact minutes earlier the Shadow Chancellor stated that 'I said that last year and I say it again today. We support increases in health and education spending'; and therefore expects the Chancellor to correct that error at the earliest opportunity.

That this House notes the resolution of 19th March 1997 on Ministerial Accountability to Parliament that 'it is of paramount importance that Ministers give accurate and truthful information to Parliament, correcting any inadvertent error at the earliest opportunity' and that 'Ministers who knowingly mislead Parliament will be expected to offer...

That this House notes the resolution of 19th March 1997 on Ministerial Accountability to Parliament that 'it is of paramount importance that Ministers give accurate and truthful information to Parliament, correcting any inadvertent error at the earliest opportunity' and that 'Ministers who knowingly mislead Parliament will be expected to offer their resignation to the Prime Minister'; and further notes that the Chancellor of the Exchequer, during exchanges on the Pre-Budget Statement on 9th November, misled the House when he said that 'We have just heard this afternoon from the Shadow Chancellor that he opposed putting that ??40 billion in ... to health and education' when in fact minutes earlier the Shadow Chancellor stated that 'I said that last year and I say it again today. We support increases in health and education spending'; and therefore expects the Chancellor to correct that error at the earliest opportunity.

That this House notes the resolution of 19th March 1997 on Ministerial Accountability to Parliament that 'it is of paramount importance that Ministers give accurate and truthful information to Parliament, correcting any inadvertent error at the earliest opportunity' and that 'Ministers who knowingly mislead Parliament will be expected to offer...

That this House pays tribute to the impressive way in which fundholding general practitioners have brought about real improvements in the standard of care provided to everyone who uses the NHS; welcomes the fact that the majority of general practitioners have chosen to become fundholders in order to take control of the care provided to their individual patients; and deplores the opposition parties' determination to destroy fundholding.

That this House pays tribute to the impressive way in which fundholding general practitioners have brought about real improvements in the standard of care provided to everyone who uses the NHS; welcomes the fact that the majority of general practitioners have chosen to become fundholders in order to take control...

That this House deplores the deceit of the Labour Party in failing to declare a figure for the national minimum wage; notes the report in the Guardian of 10th May that Mr Jack Dromey, husband of the honourable Member for Peckham, and challenger to Mr Morris for the TGWU leadership, `said that the TUC should campaign to persuade Labour to adopt a minimum wage figure of between ??4 and ??5 per hour before the election. He said he was confident that the TUC's policy will be ??4 per hour - "indeed, if you look ahead two years, it may be closure to ??5 per hour... we should seek support for that from the Labour Party".' further notes that studies by the OECD and IMF have stated that the policy of the minimum wage would cost jobs; recognises that a minimum wage in Britain of ??4 per hour, with only a half restoration of differentials would cost 750,000 jobs; reminds the honourable Member for Peckham of the comment of the Deputy Leader of the Labour Party on LWT, 25th May 1992 that 'I knew the consequences (of the minimum wage) were that there'd be some shake out (in the jobs market), any silly fool knew that'; and calls on the Labour Party to come clean on the level of the minimum wage and end this gross deceit of the British people.

That this House deplores the deceit of the Labour Party in failing to declare a figure for the national minimum wage; notes the report in the Guardian of 10th May that Mr Jack Dromey, husband of the honourable Member for Peckham, and challenger to Mr Morris for the TGWU leadership,...

That this House congratulates BBC Radio West Midlands and BBC Radio Leicester on the programmes they provide for Asian listeners across the Midlands on the Asian Network; views with concern the threat to this popular and socially useful service posed by plans to reallocate the medium wave frequencies on which it is broadcast; and in the interests of the Asian listeners, calls upon the BBC, the radio authority and the Home Secretary to agree to use of frequencies in the Midlands which will give the Asian Network security on its medium wave frequencies and also provide for future Asian independent entrants to local radio.

That this House congratulates BBC Radio West Midlands and BBC Radio Leicester on the programmes they provide for Asian listeners across the Midlands on the Asian Network; views with concern the threat to this popular and socially useful service posed by plans to reallocate the medium wave frequencies on which...

That this House congratulates the Prime Minister on having returned from Maastricht with an agreement which safeguards Britain's interest whilst enabling the Twelve to move ahead on the basis of closer co-operation not only within the institutions of the Community but also between governments; recognises that this is the fruit of months of patient diplomacy during which the Prime Minister, the Secretary of State for Foreign and Commonwealth Affairs and the Chancellor of the Exchequer have argued firmly and constructively on Britain's behalf; and considers that this vindicates the Prime Minister's strategy of placing Britain at the heart of Europe.

That this House congratulates the Prime Minister on having returned from Maastricht with an agreement which safeguards Britain's interest whilst enabling the Twelve to move ahead on the basis of closer co-operation not only within the institutions of the Community but also between governments; recognises that this is the fruit...

That this House condemns the evasive policies of the Labour Party on the future of the European Community, which are designed solely to cover up their massive split on this fundamental issue; and further condemns the Liberal Democrats for their blind rush towards Federalism.

That this House condemns the evasive policies of the Labour Party on the future of the European Community, which are designed solely to cover up their massive split on this fundamental issue; and further condemns the Liberal Democrats for their blind rush towards Federalism.

That this House deplores the endless smears and scares perpetuated by Labour Health spokesmen against the National Health Service; and, now that they have finally conceded that trust hospitals remain firmly within the National Health Service, demands that they withdraw the totally unfounded allegation that these hospitals are being privatised.

That this House deplores the endless smears and scares perpetuated by Labour Health spokesmen against the National Health Service; and, now that they have finally conceded that trust hospitals remain firmly within the National Health Service, demands that they withdraw the totally unfounded allegation that these hospitals are being privatised.