Oral question asked in the House of Lords, by Lord Stoneham of Droxford (Liberal Democrat). It was answered on Thursday, 19 May 2011.
Courts: Super-injunctions
- Question
- I thank my noble friend for his reply. Does he accept that every taxpayer has a direct public interest in the events leading up to the collapse of the Royal Bank of Scotland? So how can it be right for a super-injunction to hide the alleged relationship between Sir Fred Goodwin and a senior colleague? If true, it would be a serious breach of corporate governance and not even the Financial Services Authority would be allowed to know about it.
- Answer
-
I do not think that it is proper for me from this Dispatch Box to comment on individual cases, some of which are before the courts.
Secondary information
- Type
- Oral question
- Reference
- 727 c1490
- Session
- 2010-12
- Oral question type
- 1st Supplementary
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Conduct Injunctions Public interest Privacy Royal Bank of Scotland Goodwin, Fred
- Link
- View this Oral question on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2023-12-13 15:59:06 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1616659/-question
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1616659/-question
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/Hansard/PARLIAMENTARY_QUESTION_1616659/-question