Skip to main content

Written question asked by Tam Dalyell (Labour), in the House of Commons. It was due for an answer on Monday, 30 June 1997. It was answered by Lord Spellar (Labour) on Monday, 30 June 1997 on behalf of the Ministry of Defence.


Ministry of Defence;Defence Evaluation and Research Agency

Question
What factors underlay the exclusion of representatives of the UK Lockerbie Families group from the explosives test at Bruntinghthorpe aerodrome on 17th May. - Text of letter from John Chisholm of the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency.
Answer

Mr. Dalyell: To ask the Secretary of State for Defence what factors underlay the exclusion of representatives of the UK Lockerbie Families group from the explosives test at Bruntinghthorpe aerodrome on 17 May. [4498] Mr. Spellar: This is a matter for the Chief Executive of the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency. I have asked the Chief Executive to write to the hon. Member. Letter from John Chisholm to Mr. Tam Dalyell, dated 30 June 1997: I have been asked to reply to your question about the exclusion of representatives of the UK Lockerbie Families group from the recent explosive tests at Bruntingthorpe since, as Chief Executive of the Defence Evaluation and Research Agency (DERA) which undertook the tests, this matter is my responsibility. The research being carried out by DERA is on behalf of the Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) and the United States Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and is aimed at exploring what physical effects would result from an explosion in an aircraft at altitude and subsequently what measures might be introduced to contain those effects and limit the structural damage to the aircraft. It was those measures that were being tested in the trial. Although the media were allowed to cover the event, both DERA and its customers were concerned to ensure that the trial was reported factually as part of a disciplined and ongoing programme of scientific work. To that end DERA agreed to requests from its customers to make it a condition of entry to the site by media crews that they should not be accompanied by other parties who might seek to broaden the coverage into areas not directly concerned with the trial itself. This condition was enforced rigidly and therefore included representatives of the UK Lockerbie Families group. In fact, before the event, several television companies requested that Dr Jim Swire of the `UK Families-Flight 103' group be allowed to accompany them to watch the trial and were informed that this would not be possible. The position taken over the trial does not indicate any lack of compassion for the victims and families involved in the Lockerbie disaster. Indeed it is precisely the scale of that tragedy that has prompted the research programme which culminated in the trial at Bruntingthorpe and which, we hope, will eventually bring real benefit to aircraft safety.


Secondary information

Type
Written question
Reference
4498; 297 c61-2W;297 c61W
Session
1997-98
Subjects
Aviation Bombings Civil Aviation Authority Safety Safety measures Lockerbie Explosions Defence Evaluation and Research Agency Federal Aviation Administration Bruntingthorpe Aerodrome