Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 6 July 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance Bill.


Finance Bill

: We approach the new clause with much sympathy with its objectives, but like the hon. Member for Rayleigh (Mr. Francois), we are somewhat sceptical about the practicalities. The proposals seem principally motivated by a certain playing to the public gallery, not least because the new clause calls for the publication of something that, to my certain knowledge, has been a regular part of every Red Book for many years. I must point out to the hon. Member for Dundee, East (Stewart Hosie) that he will find a fairly extensive discussion of the Chancellor’s forecast in paragraph C49 on page 252 of the Red Book—and, indeed, a prediction by the Chancellor:"““Oil prices are expected to average $40.6 a barrel in 2005, in line with the average of independent forecasts.””" That is, of course, an assumption audited by the National Audit Office.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
436 c368 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Debts Land Insurance companies Law Excise duties Freight Fuels Inheritance tax Double taxation Investment trusts Oil Property transfer Reform Tax avoidance Taxation VAT Trusts Rural areas Stamp duty land tax Sunset clauses
Legislation
Finance Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk