Proceeding contribution from Chris Huhne (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Commons on Wednesday, 6 July 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Finance Bill.
Finance Bill
May I intervene on a point which, unfortunately, I had to learn the hard way? The hon. Member for Banff and Buchan (Mr. Salmond) may not yet have spent enough time in the Standing Committee on the Finance Bill, or in any other part of the debate on the Bill, to learn that, for reasons that have been lost in the mists of time, it is the procedure of the House that if one produces an amendment that raises revenue as opposed to reducing it, it is not selectable for debate, as I found out. So, I advertise the fact that we proposed a nice pert little amendment designed to close a loophole that Treasury Ministers opened up in the Finance Act 2004—
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 436 c374
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Children Debts Land Insurance companies Law Excise duties Freight Fuels Inheritance tax Double taxation Investment trusts Oil Property transfer Reform Tax avoidance Taxation VAT Trusts Rural areas Stamp duty land tax Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Finance Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 11:17:07 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_256874
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_256874
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_256874