Proceeding contribution from Lynne Jones (Labour) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 10 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
On post-charge questioning, my understanding, which arises from a briefing from one of the lawyers mentioned, Gareth Peirce, is that post-charge questioning was always possible and is possible, provided that significant new evidence arises. Is that not the case?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 439 c499
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Criminal investigation Detainees Arrests Chemical weapons Custodial treatment Evidence Intelligence services Incitement National security Police Powers Prosecutions Nuclear weapons Police custody Publications Police interrogation Terrorism Training Timetables Remand in custody Encouragement of terrorism Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-09-24 16:01:15 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275662
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275662
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_275662