Proceeding contribution from Duke of Montrose (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 November 2005. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].
Commons Bill [HL]
moved Amendment No. 216:"Page 21, line 41, after ““case,”” insert ““except that covered in paragraph (b),””" The noble Duke said: This is a probing amendment. Is it the Government’s intention that a court may make a removal and restoration order even in a case where the consent is in order but its terms have not been totally met? That would seem to contradict the spirit of paragraph (b), which implies that non-compliance with specific terms and conditions is open to correction rather than destruction. I beg to move.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c260GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Access Agriculture Construction Common land Land Enforcement Driving Environment protection Exemptions Local government Ownership Motor vehicles Protection Planning permission Powers Public interest Planning Management Property rights Registration Rights of way Wildlife Wind power Commons councils Village greens
- Legislation
- Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-06-20 14:36:07 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_276061
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_276061
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_276061