Proceeding contribution from Lord Greaves (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 November 2005. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].
Commons Bill [HL]
I am grateful to the Minister for that explanation, which is on the lines I expected. The amendments were a form of flying kites to get the Minister to explain how the provision will work. So if I went to the county court to get an unlawful development on a common removed; the court found that it had to be removed and issued a court order or judgment—whatever it would be—to say that it had to be removed, and it was not, I would then have to go back to the court to take action to enforce that contempt of court. Is that what the Minister is saying?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c266GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Access Agriculture Construction Common land Land Enforcement Driving Environment protection Exemptions Local government Ownership Motor vehicles Protection Planning permission Powers Public interest Planning Management Property rights Registration Rights of way Wildlife Wind power Commons councils Village greens
- Legislation
- Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-06-20 14:36:12 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_276075
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_276075
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_276075