Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Livsey of Talgarth (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 November 2005. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].


Commons Bill [HL]

I thank the Minister for agreeing that perhaps the role of the national parks needs to be re-examined. However, before withdrawing the amendment, I would like to leave the Minister with this question: what are the priorities of Natural England and CCW? If they are not assembled in a sensible, constructive way, do they address adequately the desirability of keeping families on the land in very sparsely populated areas where people are a vanishing asset in many places? That must be balanced with the economic and agricultural viability of the holdings and whether they can support families. Or will Natural England and CCW be overtaken by other priorities which do not address that social question?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c288GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Agriculture Construction Common land Land Enforcement Driving Environment protection Exemptions Local government Ownership Motor vehicles Protection Planning permission Powers Public interest Planning Management Property rights Registration Rights of way Wildlife Wind power Commons councils Village greens
Legislation
Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk