Proceeding contribution from Baroness Byford (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 14 November 2005. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].
Commons Bill [HL]
I thank the Minister for her response. I do not read into the noble Lord’s amendment any suggestion that he is trying to prevent people who have access from using it. That ought to be made clear. While the noble Lord, Lord Livsey, will speak for himself, it is certainly my opinion is that where there are restrictions on certain activities that are or are not permitted to be undertaken under the CROW Act, they should apply to this Bill as well. If I am wrong, so be it, but certainly it is not the intention to prevent people using a right of access. Rather it is to define clearly what they can do when they have such access.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c300GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Access Agriculture Construction Common land Land Enforcement Driving Environment protection Exemptions Local government Ownership Motor vehicles Protection Planning permission Powers Public interest Planning Management Property rights Registration Rights of way Wildlife Wind power Commons councils Village greens
- Legislation
- Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-06-20 14:36:18 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_276161
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_276161
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_276161