Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Viscount Tenby (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 22 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].


Road Safety Bill [HL]

My Lords, I, too, support the amendment. I offer my apologies to the House for not being able to be present for the Committee stage. I shall not fall into the trap of an endless repetition of Committee stage, and certainly not into the trap of a Second Reading speech. The amendment makes sense. At the moment we have a somewhat callous and mechanistic formula in regard to speed cameras which requires that there have to be so many deaths and so many serious injuries before you can even install one. Where there is surplus money—and here the noble Lord, Lord Bradshaw, has stolen my argument because I was going to refer to the maw of the Treasury and the money disappearing into it—it must make sense that it is put into safety measures which everyone can see and understand. Who knows, perhaps it will make people more amenable towards the whole theme of speed cameras.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
675 c1505-6 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Children Breathalysers Cameras Fixed penalties Greater London EU law Fines Driving under influence Large goods vehicles Registration Young people Safety Safety measures Roads Testing Speed limits Road traffic offences Safety belts Pedicabs Driving licences
Legislation
Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk