Proceeding contribution from Baroness Gardner of Parkes (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 22 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Road Safety Bill [HL].
Road Safety Bill [HL]
My Lords, before the noble Lord sits down, is he aware that it raises a most unfortunate parallel with minicabs when he says that outside London all these things are already regulated but in London they are not? It took years before we got regulation of minicabs in London. Why should London, as the capital, be disadvantaged? I am still unclear about what he said about TfL having the power. Does the Minister mean that TfL has the power already or not? I thought that the whole purpose of the amendment was that TfL did not have the power. I also ask the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, to accept that I never mentioned cabs. I was travelling in a bus—a large double-decker bus. It was the driver of the bus who was complaining.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 675 c1521
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Children Breathalysers Cameras Fixed penalties Greater London EU law Fines Driving under influence Large goods vehicles Registration Young people Safety Safety measures Roads Testing Speed limits Road traffic offences Safety belts Pedicabs Driving licences
- Legislation
- Road Safety Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 21:44:28 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_278347
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_278347
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_278347