---

Children and Adoption Bill [HL]

I am all for the objective which the noble Baroness has just articulated of making the Bill simpler and clearer. From these Benches I can assure her that we look positively on all the amendments, subject to the proviso—which I know she and her noble friend understand—that in approving the amendments we do not necessarily signal our approval of the principles in the clauses as a whole. I know she understands that but I feel I should record it. Perhaps the noble Baroness will be able to sort out a couple of puzzles which I am not immediately able to solve for myself. Amendments Nos. 85 and 86 strip out subsections (4) and (5) of proposed new Section 11K. Subsection (4) states:"““A court may not make an enforcement order that is to take effect on or after the coming to an end of the contact order to which it relates””." That makes eminent sense and I am not quite sure why it is coming out. Equally, I am not sure why the subsequent subsection is coming out. It seems to me to be a perfectly sensible and logical provision to have in the Bill. My other query relates to Amendments Nos. 48 and 50 and proposed new Section 11D on page 3 of the Bill. Again, it strikes me that to excise the words there would be an odd thing to do. Perhaps the noble Baroness will be able to elucidate further on those points for the benefit of the Committee.