Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Farrington of Ribbleton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Monday, 28 November 2005. It occurred during Debate on bill on Commons Bill [HL].


Commons Bill [HL]

My Lords, I am not sure whether I will be in a position to deal with the noble Duke’s question, but I will seek to do so. I can reassure the noble Duke and the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, that when determining a deregistration and exchange application the national authority will consider the effect of the exchange on each of the interests set out in subsection (6), and take into account any other relevant factor. That will inevitably involve careful consideration of exactly the sort of issues that both the noble Duke and the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, have referred to—the extent to which replacement land is a suitable substitute for release land. I hope these assurances will help. On special protection for rights of owners, landowners of both release and replacement land make the applications, so they will always have their interests protected because they are involved in that process. I hope that will reassure the noble Duke and that the noble Lord, Lord Greaves, will now feel confident in withdrawing his amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c54 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Access Applications Agriculture Arbitration Buildings Common land Countryside Council for Wales Housing Land Governing bodies Land use Grazing land Ownership Powers Membership Public appointments Management Registration Sales Time limits Sites of special scientific interest Commons Commissioners Commons councils Natural England Village greens
Legislation
Commons Bill (HL) 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk