Proceeding contribution from Lord Robertson of Port Ellen (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
Leaving aside the challenge that, ““Some people do not know about the courts but they know about something else”” and, ““Some people know about intercept evidence but they do not know enough about the courts””; Sir Swinton Thomas knows about both. So why does the noble Lord think it was that someone of his eminence, charged with this responsibility, knowing the courts as he does and knowing the material collected by the intelligence services, came to the conclusion that he put in the letter to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Ackner, and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd? Why did he come to that conclusion?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c1226
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Civil liberties Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Appeals Administration of justice Detainees Crimes against property Communication Electronic surveillance Evidence Intelligence services Judges Police Prosecutions Proscribed organisations Police custody Politics and government Scotland Terrorism Remand in custody Time limits Telephone tapping Cryptography Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 13:55:09 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286387
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286387
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286387