Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Robertson of Port Ellen (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.


Terrorism Bill

Leaving aside the challenge that, ““Some people do not know about the courts but they know about something else”” and, ““Some people know about intercept evidence but they do not know enough about the courts””; Sir Swinton Thomas knows about both. So why does the noble Lord think it was that someone of his eminence, charged with this responsibility, knowing the courts as he does and knowing the material collected by the intelligence services, came to the conclusion that he put in the letter to the noble and learned Lord, Lord Ackner, and the noble and learned Lord, Lord Lloyd? Why did he come to that conclusion?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1226 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Civil liberties Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Appeals Administration of justice Detainees Crimes against property Communication Electronic surveillance Evidence Intelligence services Judges Police Prosecutions Proscribed organisations Police custody Politics and government Scotland Terrorism Remand in custody Time limits Telephone tapping Cryptography Sunset clauses
Legislation
Terrorism Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk