Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Scotland of Asthal (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.


Terrorism Bill

I had hoped that I had made the reason clear, but I will repeat it and make clear why I say it. Intercept evidence is not simply phone tapping. It is a variety of complex sources, which are not disclosed in evidence. It is a single method. Therefore, it is not possible to disaggregate and should not therefore be left solely to the prosecution. We are very clear that we do not think, for all the reasons given so elegantly in the speeches made by my noble friend Lord Robertson and Members of the Committee who have spoken, that that would be a satisfactory way forward. We do not think that this should simply be left for the prosecution and the prosecutor to decide. That is the import of the totality of all the information that I have sought to give the Committee.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1238 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Civil liberties Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Appeals Administration of justice Detainees Crimes against property Communication Electronic surveillance Evidence Intelligence services Judges Police Prosecutions Proscribed organisations Police custody Politics and government Scotland Terrorism Remand in custody Time limits Telephone tapping Cryptography Sunset clauses
Legislation
Terrorism Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk