Proceeding contribution from Lord Elton (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.
Terrorism Bill
I am grateful for that reply, though how grateful I shall not know until I have read col. 329 of the proceedings in another place, and no doubt several columns after it. I hope that the noble Baroness will keep in mind my request that the interaction of the two Acts be kept under review. Might I ask that it is done from the point of view of a humble policeman—a custody officer—who has to be trained to do a great many other things as well and who comes up to the quite modest academic requirements for admission to the police force which have been given some publicity recently? That is not a flippant request; it is serious—and I see from his fairly accepting expression that the noble Lord wishes to say something.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 676 c1242
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Disclosure of information Civil liberties Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Appeals Administration of justice Detainees Crimes against property Communication Electronic surveillance Evidence Intelligence services Judges Police Prosecutions Proscribed organisations Police custody Politics and government Scotland Terrorism Remand in custody Time limits Telephone tapping Cryptography Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Terrorism Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 14:10:08 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286421
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286421
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_286421