Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Bassam of Brighton (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 13 December 2005. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on Terrorism Bill.


Terrorism Bill

As it happens, I dealt with the orders which were the product of a review of the PACE codes last Friday. The one thing that I solidly remember from reading the brief fairly thoroughly was that there had been very detailed consultation, not just with the usual suspects such as ACPO, as one would expect, but also, quite properly, with the Police Federation. It does not always agree with us on these matters, but, rather unusually, its members were rather pleased with the way in which the codes had been readdressed and were supportive of them. The Police Federation represents 75 per cent of the police service—perhaps slightly more than that these days—so we can take some comfort from that. We will be taking on board the noble Lord’s perspective on these issues. It is right and proper that the ordinary police constable understands the import of the codes.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
676 c1242-3 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords chamber
Subjects
Disclosure of information Civil liberties Admissibility of evidence Criminal proceedings Codes of practice Appeals Administration of justice Detainees Crimes against property Communication Electronic surveillance Evidence Intelligence services Judges Police Prosecutions Proscribed organisations Police custody Politics and government Scotland Terrorism Remand in custody Time limits Telephone tapping Cryptography Sunset clauses
Legislation
Terrorism Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk