Proceeding contribution from Lord Razzall (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 18 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Consumer Credit Bill.
Consumer Credit Bill
My Lords, I am obliged to the Minister for his comments, which do not surprise me. However, this is one of the more fundamental points outstanding on the Bill. As the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, indicated, there is a distinction between the protection given to individuals in relation to the unfair relationships tests which will go to the courts and the overall obligation of lenders to lend responsibly, as the noble Lord, Lord Borrie, and others have indicated. It may be that there are many cases where there is not an unfair relationship determined by the courts, but where a lender has not lent responsibly. Therefore, we need to reflect before Third Reading on whether this is an issue where we would want to test the opinion of the House. In the mean time I would be delighted—not delighted, but happy—to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 677 c743
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Data protection Consumers Courts Debts Credit agreements Credit Credit cards Licensing Households Internet Interest rates Low incomes Protection Loans Money lenders Plain English Regulation Repayments Unfair practices
- Legislation
- Consumer Credit Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 22:14:47 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292616
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292616
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_292616