Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Davies of Oldham (Labour) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 31 January 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill.


London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill

The noble Baroness indicated that this was a difficult and contentious amendment. All I can say is that I quake at what is to come if this is defined in those terms. Let me make the obvious point. Everybody knows what is meant by the games of the Thirtieth Olympiad. The main part of the games will be the sporting events that take place in London in the summer of 2012. However, the games go beyond sport, and, in line with the International Olympic Committee’s host city contract, there will be an ongoing, nationwide cultural festival to accompany the sporting occasion. It will include, for instance, the relay for the Olympic torch before the games and the Olympic carnival to be held during their course. The point of Clause 1(2) is to make clear that when the Bill refers to the London Olympics, it refers to the official cultural events to be held under the aegis of the games as well as to the major sporting events which we all understand. I also want to make it clear that the events to be held outside London form part of the official definition of the London Olympics. The clause states that a reference to the ““London Olympics”” includes, in particular, the non-sporting events that are required under the host city contract and the events due to take place outside London. We use the words ““in particular”” to emphasise the inclusion of these two classes. The amendment would take that away. Of course I accept that the main focus of the Olympics will be on sport and on London, where the majority of the activities are to take place, but the central meaning of the ““London Olympics”” is in fact the games of the Thirtieth Olympiad and the Paralympic Games that will take place in the same year. It is important to recognise the wider scope of the games. We are obliged to recognise it, but we do so with great enthusiasm because they represent the breadth of the concept of the Thirtieth Olympiad. Given that, I hope the noble Baroness will feel able to withdraw her amendment.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
678 c65-6GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Access Disability Conditions of employment Audit Construction Council tax Finance Land Environment Greater London Greater London Authority Infrastructure Government assistance Franchises Facilities Public appointments Planning Olympic Games Railways Railway network Mayor of London Paralympic Games Transport Sustainable development Sports Transport for London Rolling stock London 2012 Organising Committee Olympic Delivery Authority
Legislation
London Olympic Games and Paralympic Games Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk