Proceeding contribution from Simon Burns (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Thursday, 2 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Children and Adoption Bill (HL).
Children and Adoption Bill
I am grateful to the hon. Gentleman, although I am not that much of a newcomer as I have been in the Chamber for almost an hour. There is a slight problem with the hon. Gentleman’s use of the word ““equal””. When people separate and try to set up arrangements for their children, under existing law—whatever lawyers may say—it is in fact the mother who has care of the children and will decide when the father sees them. That is why many agreements are made without problem. Fathers fully understand that they cannot fight in the court for a 50–50 arrangement because the court will not give it to them.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 443 c478-9
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Commons chamber
- Subjects
- Access Children Compensation Adoption CAFCASS Arbitration Contact orders Absent parents Custody Enforcement Domestic abuse Divorce Intercountry adoption Fathers Grandparents Family proceedings Pilot schemes Protection Parents Powers Risk assessment Contempt of court Safety Separation
- Legislation
- Children and Adoption Bill (HL) 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2025-05-17 17:11:47 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304452
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304452
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_304452