Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Mark Francois (Conservative) in the House of Commons on Monday, 6 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Police and Justice Bill.


Police and Justice Bill

I am mindful of the guidance that Madam Deputy Speaker has given the House with regard to sub judice and I shall attempt to abide by it. Does my hon. Friend agree with me that when that powerful treaty was put through the House, we accepted it on the basis that it was necessary to fight the war against terror, on which we have stood shoulder to shoulder with our American counterparts? However, practical experience has shown that the US Administration have begun to use the treaty for other measures. For instance, the Internal Revenue Service has attempted to use the arrangement in order to extradite people to the US to face charges relating to white-collar crime. Does my hon. Friend accept that while the protection of revenue is important, such extraditions are against the spirit of the agreement and there should at least be equivalence on both sides, rather than allowing this anomaly to continue?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
443 c645-6 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Commons chamber
Subjects
Children Criminal proceedings Accountability Crime Arrests Aviation Anti-social behaviour Extradition Inspections Immigration Greater London Information Local government Police Powers Prisons Police custody Mergers Passengers Police authorities Police community support officers Police cautions Standards Surveillance Training Young people Young offenders Transport Social rented housing Shipping Truancy USA Anti-social behaviour orders Parenting contracts Parenting orders Crime and disorder reduction partnerships
Legislation
Police and Justice Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk