Proceeding contribution from Lord Clinton-Davis (Labour) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 8 March 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill on Civil Aviation Bill.
Civil Aviation Bill
My Lords, does my noble friend agree that in this regard the Opposition have totally misunderstood the purpose of the consultative committee, which, as he said, is to give advice? This amendment virtually gives it a veto, does it not? I think that that is entirely wrong and inconsistent with the purposes of the airport consultative committee.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c785
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Aviation Air pollution Aircraft Airports Air routes Health Fees and charges Licensing Environment Noise National parks Safety
- Legislation
- Civil Aviation Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-01-26 17:40:55 +0000
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306316
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306316
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_306316