Proceeding contribution from Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 March 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on National Lottery Bill.
National Lottery Bill
The Minister has given assurance after assurance, but does he not agree that the root cause of the problem here is the width of the words in the Bill? I think that we are now beginning dimly to understand how the power will be exercised, but is not the real problem that this power is grossly excessive in the context?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c998
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Charities Community development Cultural heritage Artworks Community Fund Licensing Expenditure Distribution Grants National Lottery Distribution Fund Lotteries National Lottery Public expenditure Publicity Public participation New Opportunities Fund Voluntary organisations Big Lottery Fund Heritage Lottery Fund National Lottery Commission
- Legislation
- National Lottery Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-16 20:16:50 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307475
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307475
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307475