Proceeding contribution from Lord Clement-Jones (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 March 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on National Lottery Bill.
National Lottery Bill
I support the amendment in principle. I have tabled an amendment which tries to do something different. The noble Viscount, Lord Astor, has put the case very clearly. We are dealing with the whole principle about moving balances from one fund to another. The view from these Benches is that it should either not exist or it should be at the behest of an independent body. I shall be arguing for a particular form of independent body, but if the Government do not accede to that, then that power should not exist. It is open to abuse, it is not qualified enough and it is a new addition to the 1993 Act. I await the Minister’s explanation with interest, but I cannot see any justification for the provision.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c1022
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Charities Community development Cultural heritage Artworks Community Fund Licensing Expenditure Distribution Grants National Lottery Distribution Fund Lotteries National Lottery Public expenditure Publicity Public participation New Opportunities Fund Voluntary organisations Big Lottery Fund Heritage Lottery Fund National Lottery Commission
- Legislation
- National Lottery Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 09:49:58 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307497
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307497
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307497