Proceeding contribution from Viscount Astor (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 March 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on National Lottery Bill.
National Lottery Bill
Before the noble Lord, Lord Clement-Jones, decides what to do with his amendment, I should like to ask the Minister a question. He talked about distributing bodies having a public consultation about part of their funding. What happens if the consultation comes back and the spending proposed would in effect be additional? What happens when the public say that they would like more policemen in their area? An interesting aspect of the amendment is the reference to devolved expenditure; it contains a protection for additionality. Will there be protection for the principle of additionality in the consultation process?
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c1036
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Charities Community development Cultural heritage Artworks Community Fund Licensing Expenditure Distribution Grants National Lottery Distribution Fund Lotteries National Lottery Public expenditure Publicity Public participation New Opportunities Fund Voluntary organisations Big Lottery Fund Heritage Lottery Fund National Lottery Commission
- Legislation
- National Lottery Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 09:50:40 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307516
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307516
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307516