Proceeding contribution from Viscount Eccles (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Monday, 13 March 2006. It occurred during Committee of the Whole House (HL) and Debate on bill on National Lottery Bill.
National Lottery Bill
I am grateful for the support of my noble friend Lord Brooke. I had in mind not so much the public’s reaction but the workings between ““Big”” and the other lottery distributors. There are a lot of leads in the document that was published: it says that the lottery will have a key role in developing better working between distributors and will administer a joint lottery forum; it will lead on developing networks for building capacity; and it is in a leadership position. The lack of balance between the position of the Big Lottery Fund and the other distributors was, and remains, of concern to me. However, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn. Clause 13 agreed to. Schedule 2 [New Schedule 4A to the National Lottery etc. Act 1993]:
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 679 c1089
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords chamber
- Subjects
- Charities Community development Cultural heritage Artworks Community Fund Licensing Expenditure Distribution Grants National Lottery Distribution Fund Lotteries National Lottery Public expenditure Publicity Public participation New Opportunities Fund Voluntary organisations Big Lottery Fund Heritage Lottery Fund National Lottery Commission
- Legislation
- National Lottery Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-21 10:54:08 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307565
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307565
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_307565