Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Skidelsky (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill.


Health Bill

I wonder whether I have understood the Minister’s remarks correctly. A delivery van will be smoke-free if used by more than one person at any time on the ground that the second person would be at risk from second-hand smoke. So if the van was driven by person A in the morning and he knew that person B was going to drive it in the afternoon, he would not be allowed to smoke. It does not seem to me that the Minister has dealt with the very valid point made by the noble Earl, Lord Howe, that there is, at that point, no danger of second-hand smoke. There is a bad smell, and that may be disturbing, but it is not a public health hazard. So how, under those circumstances, can that proposal be justified?


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c374-5GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Aircraft Boats Fixed penalties Health hazards Ferries Fines Large goods vehicles Motor vehicles Public places Passive smoking Sportsgrounds Smoking Tractors Sunset clauses
Legislation
Health Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk