Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
Health Bill
These things are always a matter of judgment. I accept that in this case it may be a matter of fine judgment. I recognise that the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee did not recommend the change that I have proposed in Amendment No. 104; nevertheless, I thought it was worth airing what I feel are important points. I would not have thought that the detail of a set of regulations was necessarily a showstopper in terms of the argument as to whether they should be affirmative or negative, but I shall take away what the Minister said and give it some thought. As regards the drafting points that I raised, I am extremely grateful for the Minister’s undertaking to look again at the wording. If he comes back and tells me that the wording is alright as it is, I shall of course accept that. I can ask for no more than the undertaking he has given. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 681 c383GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Aircraft Boats Fixed penalties Health hazards Ferries Fines Large goods vehicles Motor vehicles Public places Passive smoking Sportsgrounds Smoking Tractors Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Health Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 02:19:09 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320439
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320439
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320439