Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill.


Health Bill

These things are always a matter of judgment. I accept that in this case it may be a matter of fine judgment. I recognise that the Delegated Powers and Regulatory Reform Committee did not recommend the change that I have proposed in Amendment No. 104; nevertheless, I thought it was worth airing what I feel are important points. I would not have thought that the detail of a set of regulations was necessarily a showstopper in terms of the argument as to whether they should be affirmative or negative, but I shall take away what the Minister said and give it some thought. As regards the drafting points that I raised, I am extremely grateful for the Minister’s undertaking to look again at the wording. If he comes back and tells me that the wording is alright as it is, I shall of course accept that. I can ask for no more than the undertaking he has given. With that, I beg leave to withdraw the amendment. Amendment, by leave, withdrawn.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c383GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Aircraft Boats Fixed penalties Health hazards Ferries Fines Large goods vehicles Motor vehicles Public places Passive smoking Sportsgrounds Smoking Tractors Sunset clauses
Legislation
Health Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk