Proceeding contribution from Earl Howe (Conservative) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill.
Health Bill
I am grateful to the Minister for his reply and for explaining the underlying thinking. He does have a point that in certain circumstances signage can act as a help in enforcing legislation and in communicating effectively with the public. Nevertheless, I come back to the point I made earlier. After a period of time, the public will be familiar with the law. As regards tourists, quite a number of laws in this country are not evidenced by signage, yet we expect visitors to observe them. I am not sure how powerful an argument that really is. I was encouraged by the Minister’s mention of the expectation that the requirements on signage would be relatively light and that the Government would endeavour to respond sensitively to the concerns raised in the consultation. Those assurances are very welcome. I should like to consider the Minister’s reply in its totality between now and the next stage of the Bill. Clause 6 agreed to.
Secondary information
- Type
- Proceeding contribution
- Reference
- 681 c392-3GC
- Session
- 2005-06
- Chamber / Committee
- House of Lords Grand Committee
- Subjects
- Aircraft Boats Fixed penalties Health hazards Ferries Fines Large goods vehicles Motor vehicles Public places Passive smoking Sportsgrounds Smoking Tractors Sunset clauses
- Legislation
- Health Bill 2005-06
- Link
- View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk
Librarians' tools
- Timestamp
- 2024-04-22 01:56:52 +0100
- URI
- http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320468
- In Indexing
- http://indexing.parliament.uk/Content/Edit/1?uri=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320468
- In Solr
- https://search.parliament.uk/claw/solr/?id=http://data.parliament.uk/pimsdata/hansard/CONTRIBUTION_320468