Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Lord Monson (Crossbench) in the House of Lords on Tuesday, 9 May 2006. It occurred during Debate on bill and Committee proceeding on Health Bill.


Health Bill

I do not know what the noble Earl, Lord Howe, is thinking of doing, but I am prepared to accept the noble Lord’s assurances about Amendment No. 37. However, Amendment No. 38, although I did not put my name to it, is a different matter. The Minister said, if I understood him correctly, that he thought ““therein”” was archaic. With respect, I do not think it is archaic; it is old-fashioned but not archaic. The great merit of the word ““therein”” is that it is absolutely 100 per cent precise. There can be no ambiguity. The same does not apply to the word ““there””. We do not want to run the risk of falling foul of the law of unintended consequences. I urge the Government to think again about Amendment No. 38.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
681 c397-8GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Aircraft Boats Fixed penalties Health hazards Ferries Fines Large goods vehicles Motor vehicles Public places Passive smoking Sportsgrounds Smoking Tractors Sunset clauses
Legislation
Health Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk