Skip to main content

Proceeding contribution from Baroness Miller of Chilthorne Domer (Liberal Democrat) in the House of Lords on Wednesday, 24 May 2006. It occurred during Committee proceeding and Debate on bill on Animal Welfare Bill.


Animal Welfare Bill

moved Amendment No. 49:"After Clause 10, insert the following new clause—" ““PET THEFTS (1)   A person commits an offence if he steals a protected animal. (2)   A person guilty of an offence under subsection (1) shall be liable to— (a)   imprisonment for a term not exceeding 51 weeks, or (b)   a fine not exceeding £20,000, or to both.”” The noble Baroness said: This amendment is intended to probe whether the Government think that the punishments available for pet thefts are adequate, since the theft of pets is growing. Does the Minister have any statistics on the level of pet theft and is it a recordable crime? I believe that it is classed as a similar crime to the theft of a video recorder or television. The maximum sentence is six months imprisonment or a maximum fine of £5,000. I have chosen a different penalty, for the sake of tabling an amendment. For many people, pets are extremely important. To classify them as equal to, for example, a television, does not reflect the reality of the situation. Given the value of some stolen pedigree pets, I wonder whether, emotionally and financially, the penalties that can be imposed are sufficient, which is why I have tabled the amendment. I beg to move.


Secondary information

Type
Proceeding contribution
Reference
682 c235-6GC 
Session
2005-06
Chamber / Committee
House of Lords Grand Committee
Subjects
Children Animal housing Animal welfare Codes of practice Abuse Animals Licensing Gun sports Domestic animals Internet Game Markets Pets Primates Sales Violence Wildlife Theft Zoos Greyhounds Prizes Improvement notices Pheasants
Legislation
Animal Welfare Bill 2005-06
Link
View this Proceeding contribution on www.publications.parliament.uk